Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov;38(11):1876-1881.
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00243.

Potential Unintended Consequences Of Recent Shared Decision Making Policy Initiatives

Affiliations

Potential Unintended Consequences Of Recent Shared Decision Making Policy Initiatives

Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby et al. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Shared decision making (SDM)-when clinicians and patients make medical decisions together-is moving swiftly from an ethical ideal toward widespread clinical implementation affecting millions of patients through recent policy initiatives. We argue that policy initiatives to promote SDM implementation in clinical practice carry the risk of several unintended negative consequences if limitations in defining and measuring SDM are not addressed. We urge policy makers to include prespecified definitions of desired outcomes, offer guidance on the tools used to measure SDM in the multitude of contexts in which it occurs, evaluate the impact of SDM policy initiatives over time, review that impact at regular intervals, and revise SDM measurement tools as needed.

Keywords: Cancer patients; Health policy; Medical research; Quality of care; Shared decision making; ethics; patient engagement; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Shared Decision Making's Consequences.
    Jimbo M, Gorin SS, Kelly-Blake K. Jimbo M, et al. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Mar;39(3):537. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01783. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020. PMID: 32119606 No abstract available.

References

    1. Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S, Sepucha K. Shared decision-making: staying focused on the ultimate goal. NEJM Catalyst [serial on the Internet]. 2018. September 6 [cited 2019 Jul 31]. Available from: https://catalyst.nejm.org/shared-decision-makingpatient-decision-aids/
    1. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavorial Research. Making health care decisions: the ethical and legal implications of informed consent in the patient-practitioner relationship. Washington (DC): The Commission; 1982. October.
    1. Gärtner FR, Bomhof-Roordink H, Smith IP, Scholl I, Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH. The quality of instruments to assess the process of shared decision making: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(2): e0191747. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD001431. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Montori VM, Kunneman M, Brito JP. Shared decision making and improving health care: the answer is not in. JAMA. 2017;318(7):617–8. - PubMed

Publication types