Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 4;16(1):99.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0865-7.

Evaluation of the impact of calorie labeling on McDonald's restaurant menus: a natural experiment

Joshua Petimar  1 , Maricelle Ramirez  2   3 , Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman  2 , Stephanie Linakis  2 , Jewel Mullen  4 , Christina A Roberto  5 , Jason P Block  2
Affiliations

Evaluation of the impact of calorie labeling on McDonald's restaurant menus: a natural experiment

Joshua Petimar et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. .

Abstract

Background: The long-term effect of calorie labeling on fast-food purchases is unclear. McDonald's voluntarily labeled its menus with calories in 2012, providing an opportunity to evaluate this initiative on purchases.

Methods: From 2010 to 2014, we collected receipts from and administered questionnaires to 2971 adults, 2164 adolescents, and 447 parents/guardians of school-age children during repeated visits to 82 restaurants, including McDonald's and five control chains that did not label menus over the study period in four New England cities. In 2018, we analyzed the data by using difference-in-differences analyses to estimate associations of calorie labeling with calories purchased (actual and estimated) and predicted probability of noticing calorie information on menus.

Results: Calorie labeling at McDonald's was not associated with changes in calories purchased in adults (change = - 19 cal pre- vs. post-labeling at McDonald's compared to control chains, 95% CI: - 112, 75), adolescents (change = - 49 cal, 95% CI: - 136, 38), or children (change = 13 cal, 95% CI: - 108, 135). Calorie labeling generally increased the predicted probability of noticing calorie information, but did not improve estimation of calories purchased.

Conclusions: Calorie labeling at McDonald's was not associated with changes in calories purchased in adults, adolescents, or children. Although participants were more likely to notice calories on menus post-labeling, there was no improvement in ability to accurately estimate calories purchased.

Keywords: Calorie labeling; Menu labeling; Natural experiment; Nutrition policy; Obesity prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Food and Drug Administration. Food Labeling; Nutrition Labeling of Standard Menu Items in Restaurants and Similar Retail Food Establishments; Extension of Compliance Date. In: Food and Drug Administration, editor.: Federal Register; 2017. p. 20825–9. - PubMed
    1. Block JP, Condon SK, Kleinman K, Mullen J, Linakis S, Rifas-Shiman S, et al. Consumers' estimation of calorie content at fast food restaurants: cross sectional observational study. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2013;346:f2907. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Franckle RL, Block JP, Roberto CA. Calorie underestimation when buying high-calorie beverages in fast-food contexts. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(7):1254–1255. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303200. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wansink B, Chandon P. Meal size, not body size, explains errors in estimating the calorie content of meals. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(5):326–332. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-5-200609050-00005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Block JP. The calorie-labeling Saga - Federal Preemption and delayed implementation of public health law. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(2):103–105. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1802953. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types