This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Editorial

. 2020 Jan;124(1):12-14.

doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.09.038. Epub 2019 Nov 2.

Is less really more? A critical appraisal of a POPULAR study reanalysis

Thomas Fuchs-Buder¹, Sorin J Brull²

Affiliations

Affiliations

¹ CHRU Nancy, Nancy, France.
² Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Jacksonville, FL, USA. Electronic address: SJBrull@me.com.

PMID: 31685216
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.09.038

Free article

Editorial

Is less really more? A critical appraisal of a POPULAR study reanalysis

Thomas Fuchs-Buder et al. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jan.

Free article

. 2020 Jan;124(1):12-14.

doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.09.038. Epub 2019 Nov 2.

Authors

Thomas Fuchs-Buder¹, Sorin J Brull²

Affiliations

¹ CHRU Nancy, Nancy, France.
² Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Jacksonville, FL, USA. Electronic address: SJBrull@me.com.

PMID: 31685216
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.09.038

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Use of a train-of-four ratio of 0.95 versus 0.9 for tracheal extubation: an exploratory analysis of POPULAR data.
Blobner M, Hunter JM, Meistelman C, Hoeft A, Hollmann MW, Kirmeier E, Lewald H, Ulm K. Blobner M, et al. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jan;124(1):63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.023. Epub 2019 Oct 10. Br J Anaesth. 2020. PMID: 31607388

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Elsevier Science
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.
Medical
- ClinicalTrials.gov