Fever control interventions versus placebo, sham or no intervention in adults: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
- PMID: 31685514
- PMCID: PMC6858094
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032389
Fever control interventions versus placebo, sham or no intervention in adults: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Fever is an integral part of the inflammatory response and has therefore likely a physiological role in fighting infections. Nevertheless, whether fever in itself is beneficial or harmful in adults is unknown. This protocol for a systematic review aims at identifying the beneficial and harmful effects of fever control interventions in adults.
Methods and analysis: This protocol for a systematic review was conducted following the recommendations of Cochrane, GRADE and the eight-step assessment suggested by Jakobsen and colleagues for better validation of meta-analytical results in systematic reviews. We plan to include all relevant randomised clinical trials comparing any fever control intervention with placebo, sham or no intervention in adults. We plan to search CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, BIOSIS, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection to identify relevant trials. Any eligible trial will be assessed and classified as either at high risk of bias or low risk of bias, and our primary conclusions will be based on trials at low risk of bias. We will perform our meta-analyses of the extracted data using Review Manager 5.3 and Trial Sequential Analysis. For all our outcomes, we will create a 'Summary of Findings' table based on GRADE assessments of the certainty of the evidence.
Ethics and dissemination: No formal approval or review of ethics is required for this systematic review as individual patient data will not be included. This systematic review has the potential to highlight (1) whether one should believe fever to be beneficial, harmful or neither in adults; (2) the existing knowledge gaps on this topic; and (3) whether the recommendations from guidelines and daily clinical practice are correct. These results will be disseminated through publication in a leading peer-reviewed journal.
Prospero registration number: CRD42019134006.
Keywords: fever; fever control; meta-analysis; systematic review.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Fever therapy in febrile adults: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses.BMJ. 2022 Jul 12;378:e069620. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069620. BMJ. 2022. PMID: 35820685 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of adding adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy to standard wound care for diabetic foot ulcers: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 29;10(6):e031708. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031708. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32601110 Free PMC article.
-
Digoxin versus placebo, no intervention, or other medical interventions for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 5;6(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0470-2. Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28381269 Free PMC article.
-
Ivabradine for coronary artery disease and/or heart failure-a protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 1;8(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0957-0. Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30709418 Free PMC article.
-
Major mistakes or errors in the use of trial sequential analysis in systematic reviews or meta-analyses - the METSA systematic review.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02318-y. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024. PMID: 39251912 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Fever therapy in febrile adults: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses.BMJ. 2022 Jul 12;378:e069620. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069620. BMJ. 2022. PMID: 35820685 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of adding adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy to standard wound care for diabetic foot ulcers: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 29;10(6):e031708. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031708. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32601110 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical