Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 4;9(1):15968.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52338-8.

Assessment of Pelvic-Lumbar-Thigh Biomechanics to Optimize The Childbirth Position: An "In Vivo" Innovative Biomechanical Study

Affiliations

Assessment of Pelvic-Lumbar-Thigh Biomechanics to Optimize The Childbirth Position: An "In Vivo" Innovative Biomechanical Study

David Desseauve et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the associations between the pelvis orientation, lumbar curve and thigh postures throughout pregnancy in a population of healthy women. Additionally, optimal mechanical birth conditions in terms of the pelvic inlet and lumbar curve were researched. The individuals' posture was assessed with three-dimensional motion analysis and the lumbar curve with the Epionics SPINE system. The association between the hip joint angles (flexion and abduction), the pelvis external conjugate, and lumbar curve position was assessed with a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) adjusted to individuals' characteristics. Joint laxity was assessed with a modified Jobbin's extensometer. For all of the subjects, hip flexion and hip abduction were significantly associated with the angle between the external conjugate and spine, with higher correlation in the multivariate regression model. The association between hip flexion and the lumbar curve was less significant in multivariate than univariate regression analysis. Optimal birth conditions were never reached. The findings contribute to the understanding of the association between the hip position (flexion and abduction), pelvic orientation, and lumbar curve adjusted for joint laxity in healthy pregnant women. They lay the groundwork for future research in the field of obstetrical biomechanics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the pelvic inlet plane, external conjugate, and ANGce measured in the study (acknowledgements to Marc Arcens for his illustration).

References

    1. Visser GHA, et al. FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic. The Lancet. 2018;392:1286–1287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32113-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boerma T, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. The Lancet. 2018;392:1341–1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barber EL, et al. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011;118:29–38. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loudon JAZ, Groom KM, Hinkson L, Harrington D, Paterson-Brown S. Changing trends in operative delivery performed at full dilatation over a 10-year period. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010;30:370–375. doi: 10.3109/01443611003628411. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Unterscheider J, McMenamin M, Cullinane F. Rising rates of caesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a concerning trend. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2011;157:141–144. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.008. - DOI - PubMed