Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;67(6):299-305.
doi: 10.2144/btn-2018-0067. Epub 2019 Nov 5.

Brief freezing steps lead to robust immunofluorescence in the Drosophila nervous system

Affiliations

Brief freezing steps lead to robust immunofluorescence in the Drosophila nervous system

Ada Thapa et al. Biotechniques. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster possesses a complex nervous system, regulating sophisticated behavioral outputs, that serves as a powerful model for dissecting molecular mechanisms underlying neuronal function and neurodegenerative disease. Immunofluorescence techniques provide a way to visualize the spatiotemporal organization of these networks, permitting observation of their development, functional location, remodeling and, eventually, degradation. However, basic immunostaining techniques do not always result in efficient antibody penetration through the brain, and supplemental techniques to enhance permeability can compromise structural integrity, altering spatial organization. Here, slow freezing of brains is shown to facilitate antibody permeability without loss of antibody specificity or brain integrity. To demonstrate the advantages of this freezing technique, the results of two commonly used permeation methods - detergent-based and partial proteolytic digestion - are compared.

Keywords: Drosophila; Drosophila melanogaster; IF; Per; Period; antibody; brain; circadian; flies; fluorescence; freezing; imaging; immunofluorescence; microscopy; nervous system; neural circuit; phalloidin; sleep; staining; wake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial & competing interests disclosure

This research received funding from the University of Missouri Research Board and the NIH Academic Development Via Applied and Cutting Edge Research (ADVANCER) program. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Comparison of four immunofluorescence techniques reveals quantitative and qualitative differences in detection of circadian clock neurons.
Oregon-R third instar larval brains were dissected and stained using the indicated immunofluorescence techniques. Anti-Per was used to specifically detect circadian clock neurons. Maximum projections from three representative brains are shown from each technique. Scale bars: 20 μm. Microscope settings were kept constant across techniques. Voxels for each lobe were quantified and the data is shown. A t-test was used to determine whether total signal detected by each technique was significantly different from the basic protocol. Diagrammed are locations of per/tim-expressing cells and their projections in the larval brain, reproduced from Helfrich-Forster [9].
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Detail of third instar larval brains focusing on anti-Per immunofluorescence in axons shows quantitative and qualitative differences.
Oregon-R third instar larval brains were dissected and stained using the techniques indicated. Anti-Per was used to stain clock neurons. Brains were imaged and analyzed as above, focusing on the axons displayed. Maximum projections from three representative brains from each technique are shown. Scale bars: 20 μm. A dotted-outline on the diagram, described above, shows the location of enlargement.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Comparison of immunofluorescence techniques reveals equal staining of F-actin, but reveals distortion of lobe shape upon enzyme treatment.
Oregon-R third instar larval brains were dissected and stained using the indicated techniques. Phalloidin was used to stain F-actin and visualize the cytoskeleton. Brains were imaged and analyzed as above. Maximum projections from three representative brains from each technique are shown. Scale bars: 10 μm.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Visualizing DNA/nuclei reveals differences in maintenance of brain-region organization and overall shape between immunofluorescence techniques.
Oregon-R third instar larval brains were dissected and stained using the indicated techniques. DAPI was used to stain DNA/nuclei. Brains were imaged as above. Maximum projections from three representative brains from each technique are shown. Scale bars: 20 μm.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. In adult Drosophila brains, freezing leads to qualitative but not quantitative differences in clock neuron staining.
Immunostaining of Oregon-R adult brains using an anti-Per antibody to reveal circadian clock neurons. Brains were imaged and analyzed as above. Maximum projections from three representative brains from each technique are shown. Scale bars: 20 μm. Diagrammed are the locations of per/tim-expressing cells and their projections in the adult brain, reproduced from Helfrich-Forster [9]. DN: Dorsal Neurons; H-B: Photoreceptor cells of the Hofbauer-Buchner eyelets; LN: Lateral neurons (l: large; s: small; d: dorsal); PLtim: Posterior lateral brain cells expressing tim; R: photoreceptor nuclei (there are two groups 1–6 and 7/8).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. In adult brains, detection of F-actin is increased by including a freezing step.
Oregon-R adult brains were dissected and stained using Phalloidin to stain F-actin. Brains were imaged and analyzed as above. Maximum projections from three representative brains from each technique are shown. Scale bars: 20 μm.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.. Imaging of DNA/nuclei in adult brains reveals comparable maintenance of overall morphology after freezing.
Oregon-R adult brains were dissected and stained using each of the three techniques detailed in the protocol. DAPI was used to stain DNA/nuclei. Brains were imaged as above. Maximum projections from three representative brains from each technique are shown. Scale bars: 20 μm.

References

    1. Pandey UB, Nichols CD. Human disease models in Drosophila melanogaster and the role of the fly in therapeutic drug discovery. Pharmacol. Rev. 63(2), 411–436 (2011). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daul AL, Komori H, Lee CY. Immunofluorescent staining of Drosophila larval brain tissue. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2010(7), pdb prot5460 (2010). - PubMed
    1. Wu JS, Luo L. A protocol for dissecting Drosophila melanogaster brains for live imaging or immunostaining. Nat. Protoc. 1(4), 2110–2115 (2006). - PubMed
    1. Diaper DC, Hirth F. Immunostaining of the developing embryonic and larval Drosophila brain. Methods Mol. Biol. 1082, 3–17 (2014). - PubMed
    1. Kloss B, Price JL, Saez L. et al. The Drosophila clock gene double-time encodes a protein closely related to human casein kinase Iepsilon. Cell 94(1), 97–107 (1998). - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources