Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb;84(2):222-231.
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002029.

Evaluating Current Scar Assessment Methods

Affiliations
Review

Evaluating Current Scar Assessment Methods

Kelsey Lipman et al. Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Current scar surveys have included many questions to evaluate the physical characteristics of scars, with some expanding to include physical implications and patient opinions. This review provides an analysis of frequently used scar assessment methods to date and highlights potential areas for improvement. We build the case that a new assessment tool is necessary, specifically one that centers on psychosocial consequences of scars that influence patient decision making for treatment, allowing physicians to individualize treatment conversations with patients. We postulate that survey techniques used in consumer product marketing, such as choice-based conjoint analysis, may be effective in determining the factors strongly influencing patient decision making and spending in scar treatment; therefore, more research in this area is warranted. By incorporating these psychosocial and economic considerations driving scar treatment decisions, future scar assessment tools may accomplish much more than characterizing/documenting the clinical aspects of scars. Rather, these patient-centered, holistic tools may be implemented by plastic surgeons and other clinicians specifically to provide patients with personalized treatment options that maximize long-term patient satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Valencia IC, Falabella AF, Schachner LA. New developments in wound care for infants and children. Pediatr Ann. 2001;30:211–218.
    1. Longaker MT. Regenerative medicine: a surgeon's perspective. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:11–17; discussion 17, 18.
    1. Finnerty CC, Jeschke MG, Branski LK, et al. Hypertrophic scarring: the greatest unmet challenge after burn injury. Lancet. 2016;388:1427–1436.
    1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. ASPS 2017 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. Arlington Heights, IL; 2017. Available at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics. Accessed July 4, 2019.
    1. Global Market Study on Scar Treatment: scar treatment products segment to surpass US$ 19,562 Million by 2022, North America continues to be the largest market for scar treatments. Persistence Market Research. 2015.

LinkOut - more resources