Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar/Apr;31(2):e149-e151.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006079.

Does Postauricular Incision Cause Auricula Protrusion After Tympanoplasty?

Affiliations

Does Postauricular Incision Cause Auricula Protrusion After Tympanoplasty?

Gökhan Akgül et al. J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Mar/Apr.

Abstract

Background: An ear surgery can be performed via transcanal, endaural, or postauricular approach according to the surgeon's desicion. The postauricular one is the most commonly performed approach.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether preferring postauricular approach during ear surgery cause auricular protrusion in over time.

Methods: Thirty-six patients who underwent tympanoplasty operation with postauricular incision were included in this study. Any patient who was under 18 years of age, those with auricular deformity and patients who underwent tympanoplasty operation with mastoidectomy were excluded from this study. The distances from mastoid area to superior and mid-point of helix were measured preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively.

Results: A total of 36 patients' data were analyzed. There were 13 males and 23 females. The mean age was 28.2 ± years (18-59). The preoperative mean distance from mastoid area to superior point of helix was 15.03 ± 2.86 mm, whereas it was 17.92 ± 2.96 mm at mid-helix level. At postoperative 1 year, the same distances were measured 14.67 ± 3.12 mm and 17.25 ± 3.17 mm, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between preoperative and postoperative measures.

Conclusion: Although the structures that provide the stability of the auricle are cut during postauricular sulcus incision, long-term follow-up of patients did not show any protrusion of auricula.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Guyuron B, DeLuca L. Ear projection and the posterior auricular muscle insertion. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100:457–460.
    1. Smith DW. Protruding auricle: a neuromuscular sign. Lancet 1978; 1:747–749.
    1. Ali MS. Unilateral secondary (acquired) postmastoidectomy low-set ear: postoperative complication with potential functional and cosmetic implications. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 38:240–245.
    1. Okur E, Kahveci OK, Miman MC, et al. Ear protrusion after tympanoplasty and the use of mastoid dressing. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2014; 24:74–77.
    1. Hong P, Arseneault T, Makki F. A long-term analysis of auricular position in pediatric patients who underwent post-auricular approaches. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 78:471–473.

LinkOut - more resources