Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 5;14(11):e0224687.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224687. eCollection 2019.

Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study

Addi P L van Bergen  1   2 , Annelies van Loon  3 , Matty A S de Wit  3 , Stella J M Hoff  4 , Judith R L M Wolf  5 , Albert M van Hemert  2
Affiliations

Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study

Addi P L van Bergen et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: The recently developed Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS) revealed particularly strong social exclusion in non-Western immigrant groups compared to the native Dutch population. To qualify such results, cross-cultural validation of the SEI-HS in non-Western immigrant groups is called for.

Methods: A sequential explanatory mixed methods design was used, employing quantitative data from the Netherlands Public Health Monitor along with qualitative interviews. Data from 1,803 adults aged 19 years or older of Surinamese, 1,009 of Moroccan and 1,164 of Turkish background and 19,318 native Dutch living in the four largest cities in the Netherlands were used to test the factorial structure of the SEI-HS and differential item functioning across immigrant groups. Additionally, 52 respondents with a high score on the SEI-HS and from different background were interviewed on the item content of the SEI-HS and subjective feelings of exclusion. For each SEI-HS item the semantic, conceptual and contextual connotations were coded and compared between the immigrant groups and native Dutch.

Results: High levels of social exclusion were found in 20.0% of the urban population of Surinamese origin, 20.9% of Moroccan, 28.7% of Turkish and 4.2% of native Dutch origin. The 4-factor structure of the SEI-HS was confirmed in all three immigrant groups. None of the items demonstrated substantial differential item functioning in relation to immigration background. The interviews uncovered some methodological shortcomings, but these did not substantially impact the observed excess of social exclusion in immigrant groups.

Conclusions: The present study provides evidence in support of the validity of the SEI-HS in adults of Surinamese, Moroccan and Turkish background and confirms the major social exclusion of these immigrant groups in the main cities in the Netherlands. Policy measures to enhance social inclusion and reduce exclusion are urgently needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flowchart study design.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Millar J. Social exclusion and social policy research: defining exclusion In: Abrams D. CJ, Gordon D., editor. Multidisciplinary handbook of social exclusion research. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2007. p. 1–16.
    1. Popay J, Escorel S, Hernández M, Johnston H, Mathieson J, Rispel L. Understanding and Tackling Social Exclusion Final Report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health from the Social Exclusion Knowledge Network. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
    1. Mathieson J, Popay J, Enoch E, Escorel S, Hernandez M, Johnston H, et al. Social Exclusion. Meaning, measurement and experience and links to health inequalities A review of literature. Geneva: WHO Social Exclusion Knowledge Network; 2008.
    1. Pemberton S, Sutton E, Fahmy E. A review of the qualitative evidence relation to the experience of poverty and exclusion. Poverty and Social Exclusion in the UK Working Paper Methods Series No. 22; 2013. p. 1–60.
    1. Taket A, Crisp BR, Nevill A, Lamaro G, Graham M, Barter-Godfrey S. Theorising social exclusion. Routledge; 2009.

Publication types