Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;51(1):409-416.
doi: 10.1007/s42770-019-00178-z. Epub 2019 Nov 5.

Isolation and characterization of phage AHP-1 and its combined effect with chloramphenicol to control Aeromonas hydrophila

Affiliations

Isolation and characterization of phage AHP-1 and its combined effect with chloramphenicol to control Aeromonas hydrophila

H P S U Chandrarathna et al. Braz J Microbiol. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

To develop an alternative bio-control measure for multi-drug resistant pathogenic Aeromonas hydrophila, which causes motile Aeromonas septicemia in fish, novel virulent phage (AHP-1) was isolated from carp tissues. Morphological analysis by transmission electron microscopy revealed that AHP-1 belongs to Myoviridae family. AHP-1 displayed 81% of moderate adsorption by 25 min, and latent period of 40 min with burst size of 97 PFU mL-1 at an optimal multiplicity of infection (MOI) 0.1. AHP-1 was stable over a broad range of pH (4-11), temperature (4-50 °C), and salinity (0.1-3.5%). Both time and MOI dependent in vitro A. hydrophila growth inhibition was observed with AHP-1. AHP-1 (10 MOI) showed higher growth inhibition against A. hydrophila than chloramphenicol (5 μg mL-1), and combined treatment was more promising than individuals. Immune gene expression analysis of zebrafish upon continuous bath exposure to AHP-1 resulted significantly higher (il-6 and sod-1) or slight induction (tnf-α, il1-β, il-10, and cxcl-8a) than controls at beginning of the phage exposure, but those lowered to basal level by day 12 post-phage exposure. It suggests no adverse immune responses have occurred for the AHP-1 dose that used, and have potential for the phage therapy. Further detailed in vivo studies are needed to confirm the protective efficacy of newly isolated AHP-1 against A. hydrophila infection.

Keywords: A. hydrophila; Chloramphenicol; Fish pathogen; Immune responses; Multi-drug resistance; Phage AHP-1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Characterization of AHP-1: a plaque morphology, b TEM image showing icosahedral head and sheathed tail tube with tail fiber of AHP-1. Bar = 100 nm, c adsorption curve, d one-step growth profile of AHP-1 indicating burst size and latent period. All the experiments were conducted at MOI = 0.1 as independent duplicate experiments, e stability of AHP-1 in a range of temperatures (4–65 °C), pH (2–14), salinity (0.1–3.5%), and different organic solvents (chloroform, ethanol; EtOH, diethyl ether, acetone). Phage stability percentages of temperature, pH, salinity, and organic solvents were calculated based on 4 °C, 10, 2%, and SM buffer, respectively. Error bars represent mean ± SE
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of individual and combined in vitro effect on A. hydrophila growth inhibition over the time with AHP-1 and chloramphenicol: a growth inhibition by AHP-1 at different MOI (10, 1, 0.1, and 0.01), b growth inhibition by chloramphenicol at different doses (2.5, 5, 15, and 25 μg mL−1), c combined effect on growth inhibition by AHP-1 and chloramphenicol. Error bars represent mean ± SE; chloramphenicol = Chlorm
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Transcriptional analysis of immune related genes (cxcl-8a, il1-β, tnf-α, il-6, il-10, and sod-1) in adult zebrafish upon bath exposure of AHP-1 for 12 days. Experiments were conducted as independent duplicate experiments for control and phage exposure. Tissues were pooled (n = 3) at each time point for each replicate group. Relative mRNA expression fold change for a particular candidate gene of SM buffer exposed fish at day 1 = 1. Asterisk represents significantly different (P < .05) values with controls. Error bars represent mean ± SE

References

    1. Zaman SB, Hussain MA, Nye R, Mehta V, Mamun KT, Hossain N. A review on antibiotic resistance: alarm bells are ringing. Cureus. 2017;9:e1403. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1403. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aslam B, Wang W, Arshad MI, Khurshid M, Muzammil S, Rasool MH, Nisar MA, Alvi RF, Aslam MA, Qamar MU, Salamat MKF, Baloch Z. Antibiotic resistance: a rundown of a global crisis. Infect Drug Resist. 2018;11:1645–1658. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S173867. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miranda CD, Godoy FA, Lee MR. Current status of the use of antibiotics and the antimicrobial resistance in the Chilean salmon farms. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1–14. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01284. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salmond GPC, Fineran PC. A century of the phage: past, present and future. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13:777–786. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3564. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rose T, Verbeken G, De Vos D, Merabishvili M, Vaneechoutte M, Lavigne R, Jennes S, Zizi M, et al. Experimental phage therapy of burn wound infection: difficult first steps. Int J Burns Trauma. 2014;4:66–73. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms