Efficacy and safety of MYL-1501D versus insulin glargine in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus: Results of the INSTRIDE 3 phase 3 switch study
- PMID: 31691472
- PMCID: PMC7065063
- DOI: 10.1111/dom.13904
Efficacy and safety of MYL-1501D versus insulin glargine in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus: Results of the INSTRIDE 3 phase 3 switch study
Abstract
Aims: To assess the efficacy, insulin dose, safety and immunogenicity when people with type 1 diabetes mellitus switched between MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine (Lantus®; Sanofi-Aventis US LLC, Bridgewater, New Jersey).
Materials and methods: Eligible participants from INSTRIDE 1 who completed 52 weeks of reference insulin glargine treatment were randomized 1:1 to the reference sequence (n = 63; reference insulin glargine for 36 weeks) or to the treatment-switching sequence (n = 64; MYL-1501D [weeks 0-12], reference insulin glargine [weeks 12-24] and MYL-1501D [weeks 24-36]). Change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to week 36 was the primary efficacy endpoint used to demonstrate equivalence between the two treatment sequences. Secondary endpoints included: change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) and insulin dose; immunogenicity; and adverse events, including hypoglycaemia.
Results: Mean changes in HbA1c (least squares [LS] mean [SE]) from baseline to week 36 were -0.05 (0.032) and -0.06 (0.034) for the treatment-switching and reference sequences, respectively (LS mean difference 0.01 [95% CI -0.085 to 0.101]). Treatment sequences were comparable in terms of secondary endpoints, including FPG, SMBG and insulin dose, and the safety and immunogenicity profiles of the two sequences were similar.
Conclusions: Switching participants between MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine demonstrated equivalent efficacy and similar safety and immunogenicity, showing that people taking reference insulin glargine can safely switch to MYL-1501D.
Keywords: biosimilar; insulin glargine; switch; type 1 diabetes.
© 2019 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
T.C.B. has received clinical research support from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Lexicon, Merck, Mylan, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi. A.B., Y.R., P.A., B.S. and R.M. are paid employees of Mylan Inc. and may hold stock or stock options in the company. S.A. is a paid employee of Biocon Research Ltd and may hold stock or stock options in the company.
Figures



References
-
- American Diabetes Association , Classification and diagnosis of diabetes . 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(suppl 1):S11‐S24. - PubMed
-
- American Diabetes Association . Glycemic targets. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(suppl 1):S48‐S56. - PubMed
-
- Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group , Nathan DM, Genuth S, et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long‐term complications in insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977—986. - PubMed
-
- Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, et al. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study Research Group. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2643‐2653. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lantus [package insert] . Bridgewater. Sanofi‐Aventis US LLC: NJ; 2015.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources