Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan;39(1):35-44.
doi: 10.1002/nau.24208. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

How well do published randomized controlled trials on pelvic floor muscle training interventions for urinary incontinence describe the details of the intervention? A review

Marylène Charette  1 , Marie-Ève Bérubé  2 , Kaylee Brooks  2 , Jennifer O'Neil  2   3 , Lucie Brosseau  2 , Linda McLean  2   3
Affiliations
Review

How well do published randomized controlled trials on pelvic floor muscle training interventions for urinary incontinence describe the details of the intervention? A review

Marylène Charette et al. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Context: Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is strongly recommended for the management of mild to moderate urinary incontinence (UI) in women, yet the specific elements of PFMT that lead to improvement have not been identified. This gap in knowledge may be related, at least in part, to the lack of detail provided on intervention parameters reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) OBJECTIVE: Using three different instruments: the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT), the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist, and the Consensus on Therapeutic Exercise Training (CONTENT) scale, the purpose of this study was to assess the completeness of exercise reporting among moderate to high quality RCTs on PFMT for women with UI.

Methods: Two raters independently scored all 65 RCTs (n = 65) retrieved by the most up-to-date Cochrane Systematic Review on PFMT for women with UI, and only those of moderate to high quality (>6 on the PEDro scale) were retained. Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria and were scored by two independent reviewers using the CERT, TIDieR, and CONTENT instruments. The completeness of intervention reporting was evaluated using descriptive statistics.

Results: Over half of the items on each instrument were reported less than 50% of the time. Overall, completeness of exercise reporting was 31% (5.8/16 ± 2.4) on CERT, 47% (5.6/12 ± 1.5) on TIDieR, and 46% (4.1/9 ± 1) on CONTENT. The least frequently reported items were the provider of the intervention, the equipment used, the tailoring of exercises, the rationale behind the intervention, and adherence to the intervention.

Conclusion: PFMT parameters are not adequately reported in the primary RCTs that currently guide clinical practice.

Keywords: CERT; CONTENT; TIDieR; exercise reporting; pelvic floor muscle training; urinary incontinence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Milsom I, Altman D, Lapitan MC, Nelson R, Sillén U, Thom D. Epidemiology of urinary (UI) and faecal (FI) incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). 5th International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and Treatment of Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Faecal Incontinence. 2013;35-112.
    1. Dumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;10(10):CD005654.
    1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A. ICI-ICS. Bristol, UK: International Continence Society; 2017.
    1. Hacke C, Nunan D, Weisser B. Do exercise trials for hypertension adequately report interventions? A reporting quality study. Int J Sports Med. 2018;39(12):902-908.
    1. Jo D, Del Bel MJ, McEwen D, et al. A study of the description of exercise programs evaluated in randomized controlled trials involving people with fibromyalgia using different reporting tools, and validity of the tools related to pain relief. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(3):557-563.

LinkOut - more resources