Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Dec;21(12):1863-1871.
doi: 10.1111/jch.13726. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

Conventional and new electrocardiographic criteria for hypertension-mediated cardiac organ damage: A narrative review

Affiliations
Review

Conventional and new electrocardiographic criteria for hypertension-mediated cardiac organ damage: A narrative review

Francesca Miceli et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) is frequently observed in hypertensive patients at different cardiovascular (CV) risk profile. This may have both diagnostic and therapeutic implications for the choice of the most appropriate therapies. Among different markers of HMOD, the most frequent functional and structural adaptations can be observed at cardiac level, including left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), diastolic dysfunction, aortic root dilatation, and left atrial enlargement. In particular, LVH was shown to be a strong and independent risk factor for major CV events, namely myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, CV death. Thus, early identification of LVH is a key element for preventing CV events in hypertension. Although echocardiographic assessment of LVH represents the gold standard technique, this is not cost-effective and cannot be adopted in routine clinical practice of hypertension. On the other hand, electrocardiographic (ECG) assessment of HMOD relative to the heart is a simple, reproducible, widely available and cost-effective method to assess the presence of LVH, and could be preferred in large scale screening tests. Several new indicators have been proposed and tested in observational studies and clinical trials of hypertension, in order to improve the relatively low sensitivity of the conventional ECG criteria for LVH, despite high specificity. This article reviews the differences in the use of the main conventional and the new 12 lead ECG criteria of LVH for early assessment of asymptomatic, subclinical cardiac HMOD in a setting of clinical practice of hypertension.

Keywords: cardiac organ damage; electrocardiogram; hypertension; hypertension-mediated organ damage; left ventricular hypertrophy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustrative representation of conventional (panel A) and novel (panel B) criteria for electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy

References

    1. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Age‐specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta‐analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360:1903‐1913. - PubMed
    1. Katholi RE, Couri DM. Left ventricular hypertrophy: Major risk factor in patients with hypertension: Update and practical clinical applications. Int J Hypertens. 2011;2011:495349. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Devereux RB, Bella J, Boman K, et al. Echocardiographic left ventricular geometry in hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy: the life study. Blood Press. 2001;10:74‐82. - PubMed
    1. Wachtell K, Olsen MH, Dahlof B, et al. Microalbuminuria in hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy: the life study. J Hypertens. 2002;20:405‐412. - PubMed
    1. Hawkins NM, Wang D, McMurray JJ, et al. Investigators C, Committees. Prevalence and prognostic implications of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in heart failure: evidence from the charm programme. Heart. 2007;93:59‐64. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms