Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Dec;31(6):732-738.
doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000815.

Clinical utility of genomic sequencing

Affiliations
Review

Clinical utility of genomic sequencing

Matthew B Neu et al. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Identifying pathogenic variation underlying pediatric developmental disease is critical for medical management, therapeutic development, and family planning. This review summarizes current genetic testing options along with their potential benefits and limitations. We also describe results from large-scale genomic sequencing projects in pediatric and neonatal populations with a focus on clinical utility.

Recent findings: Recent advances in DNA sequencing technology have made genomic sequencing a feasible and effective testing option in a variety of clinical settings. These cutting-edge tests offer much promise to both medical providers and patients as it has been demonstrated to detect causal genetic variation in ∼25% or more of previously unresolved cases. Efforts aimed at promoting data sharing across clinical genetics laboratories and systematic reanalysis of existing genomic sequencing data have further improved diagnostic rates and reduced the number of unsolved cases.

Summary: Genomic sequencing is a powerful and increasingly cost-effective alternative to current genetic tests and will continue to grow in clinical utility as more of the genome is understood and as analytical methods are improved. The evolution of genomic sequencing is changing the landscape of clinical testing and requires medical professionals who are adept at understanding and returning genomic results to patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Genome sequencing workflow demonstrating processes necessary to go from a patient blood sample to medical intervention.

References

    1. Garro N, Pellegrini C, Viehmann L, Berry C & Holmes J March of Dimes Foundation Data Book for Policy Makers. (2016).
    1. Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD & Arias E Mortality in the United States, 2017. NCHS Data Brief (2018). - PubMed
    1. Shendure J et al. DNA sequencing at 40: past, present and future. Nature 550, 345–353 (2017). - PubMed
    1. Karczewski KJ et al. Variation across 141,456 human exomes and genomes reveals the spectrum of loss-of-function intolerance across human protein-coding genes. bioRxiv (2019). doi:10.1101/531210 - DOI
    1. Lek M et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 536, 285–291 (2016). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources