Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 6;14(11):e0224747.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224747. eCollection 2019.

Contactless monitoring of heart and respiratory rate in anesthetized pigs using infrared thermography

Affiliations

Contactless monitoring of heart and respiratory rate in anesthetized pigs using infrared thermography

Carina Barbosa Pereira et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Pig experiments have played an important role in medical breakthroughs during the last century. In fact, pigs are one of the major animal species used in translational research, surgical models and procedural training due to their anatomical and physiological similarities to humans. To ensure high bioethical standards in animal trials, new directives have been implemented, among others, to refine the procedures and minimize animals' stress and pain. This paper presents a contactless motion-based approach for monitoring cardiorespiratory signals (heart rate and respiratory rate) in anesthetized pigs using infrared thermography. Heart rate monitoring is estimated by measuring the vibrations (precordial motion) of the chest caused by the heartbeat. Respiratory rate, in turn, is computed by measuring the mechanical chest movements that accompany the respiratory cycle. To test the feasibility of this approach, thermal videos of 17 anesthetized pigs were acquired and analyzed. A high agreement between infrared thermography and a gold standard (electrocardiography and capnography-derived respiratory rate) was achieved. The mean absolute error averaged 3.43 ± 3.05 bpm and 0.27 ± 0.48 breaths/min for heart rate and respiratory rate, respectively. In sum, infrared thermography is capable of assessing cardiorespiratory signals in pigs. Future work should be conducted to evaluate infared thermography capability of capturing information for long term monitoring of research animals in a diverse set of facilities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.C. is co-founder and CEO of Docs in Clouds GmbH, a provider of engineering services developing camera-based systems to assess vital data in various medical and non-medical applications. However, this does not alter our adheren ce to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Schematic overview of the HR algorithm.
A: Selection of regions of interest (ROI). B: Detection and tracking of feature points. C: Extraction of feature points’ trajectories. D: Temporal filtering. E: Blind source separation via principal component analysis (PCA). F: Rank principal components (PCs) based on their variance. G: Computation of frequency spectra and estimation of HR.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Schematic overview of the RR algorithm.
A: Selection of ROI. B: Detection and tracking of feature points. C: Extraction of feature points’ trajectories. D: Temporal filtering. E: Blind source separation via PCA. F: Rank PCs based on their variance. G: Computation of frequency spectra and estimation of RR.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Correlation plot and Bland-Altman plot comparing HR assessed with infrared thermography (HRIRT) and HR assessed using ECG (HRGS).
The plots include the data from all the 17 animals. A: The plot on the left shows an R-squared of 0.9598 and a sum of squared errors of 4.8 bpm. B: The graph on the right presents a bias of -0.14 bpm (solid line), and the 95% limits of agreement vary between -9.3 and 9.0 bpm (dashed lines).
Fig 4
Fig 4. Correlation plot and Bland-Altman plot comparing RR assessed with infrared thermography (RRIRT) and RR assessed using the ventilator (RRGS).
The plots include the data from all the 17 animals. A: The plot on the left shows an R-squared of 0.97 and a sum of squared errors of 0.56 breaths/min. B: The graph on the right presents a bias of -0.14 breaths/min (solid line), and the 95% limits of agreement vary between -0.9 and 1.2 breaths/min (dashed lines).

References

    1. Festing S, Wilkinson R. The ethics of animal research. Talking Point on the use of animals in scientific research. EMBO Rep. 2007;8(6):526–530. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400993 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ison SH, Clutton RE, Di Giminiani P, Rutherford KMD. A Review of Pain Assessment in Pigs. Front Vet Sci. 2016;3 10.3389/fvets.2016.00108 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Exner C, Bode H, Blumer K, Giese C. Animal Experiments in Research Eds. Senate Commission on Animal Protection and Experimentation. Bonn: Lemmens Medien GmbH; 2007.
    1. Russell WMS, Burch RL. The principles of humane experimental technique. London: Methuen; 1959.
    1. Science, Medicine, and Animals. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 1991. - PubMed

Publication types