Sensory Preference and Professional Profile Affinity Definition of Endangered Native Breed Eggs Compared to Commercial Laying Lineages' Eggs
- PMID: 31694158
- PMCID: PMC6912648
- DOI: 10.3390/ani9110920
Sensory Preference and Professional Profile Affinity Definition of Endangered Native Breed Eggs Compared to Commercial Laying Lineages' Eggs
Abstract
This study aimed to compare Utrerana native hen eggs' sensory properties to Leghorn Lohmann LSL-Classic lineage's commercial and ecological eggs through free-choice profiling. Second, affine and non-affine profiles were defined using the information provided by professionally-instructed panelists on six sets (sensory attributes, diet habits, production context awareness, product consciousness, cuisine applicability and panelist attributes) using nonlinear canonical correlation analysis. Sixty-four instructed professional panelists rated 96 eggs on 39 variables comprising the above-mentioned sets. Observers reported a significantly higher appreciation (p > 0.05) towards yolk color, odor, flavor, texture, overall score, and whole and on plate broken egg visual value when Utrerana eggs were compared to the rest of categories. Professional Profile A (PPA), or egg non-affine profile, consumed less eggs and provided lower scores to sensory attributes than Professional Profile B (PPB), or affine profile. Additionally, PPB accounted for higher knowledge about the Utrerana breed and provided greater importance to a product's ecological and autochthonous nature. PPA was generally characterized by women under 20 years old with no higher studies, while PPB comprised 21-40 years old men with secondary studies. In conclusion, defining professional profiles enables correctly approaching market needs to improve the profitability of Utrerana eggs, meeting professional demands and educating non-affine profiles.
Keywords: academic level; cuisine applicability; product knowledge; production context awareness; professional profile; sensory attributes.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures









References
-
- Orozco F. Razas de Gallinas Españolas. 1st ed. Mundi-Prensa Libros S.A.; Madrid, Spain: 1989. p. 216.
-
- FAOSTAT (Search Terms: RegionsProduction Quantity; Items>Eggs, hen, in shell (number); Years>2017) [(accessed on 23 June 2019)]; Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/
-
- Blokhuis H., Jones R., Geers R., Miele M., Veissier I. Measuring and monitoring animal welfare: Transparency in the food product quality chain. Anim. Welf. 2003;12:445–455.
-
- González Ariza A., Navas González F.J., Arando Arbulu A., León Jurado J.M., Barba Capote C.J., Camacho Vallejo M.E. Non-Parametrical Canonical Analysis of Quality-Related Characteristics of Eggs of Different Varieties of Native Hens Compared to Laying Lineage. Animals. 2019;9:153. doi: 10.3390/ani9040153. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Alderson G. Conservation of breeds and maintenance of biodiversity: Justification and methodology for the conservation of Animal Genetic Resources. Archivos de Zootecnia. 2018;65:300–309. doi: 10.21071/az.v67i258.3668. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources