Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 15;26(4):892-901.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0556. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

The Prognostic and Therapeutic Role of Genomic Subtyping by Sequencing Tumor or Cell-Free DNA in Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Affiliations

The Prognostic and Therapeutic Role of Genomic Subtyping by Sequencing Tumor or Cell-Free DNA in Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Minglei Zhuo et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: The optimal systemic treatment for pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is still under debate. Previous studies showed that LCNEC with different genomic characteristics might respond differently to different chemotherapy regimens. In this study, we sought to investigate genomic subtyping using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis in advanced LCNEC and assess its potential prognostic and predictive value.

Experimental design: Tumor DNA and cfDNA from 63 patients with LCNEC were analyzed by target-captured sequencing. Survival and response analyses were applied to 54 patients with advanced stage incurable disease who received first-line chemotherapy.

Results: The mutation landscape of frequently mutated cancer genes in LCNEC from cfDNA closely resembled that from tumor DNA, which led to a 90% concordance in genomic subtyping. The 63 patients with LCNEC were classified into small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)-like and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-like LCNEC based on corresponding genomic features derived from tumor DNA and/or cfDNA. Overall, patients with SCLC-like LCNEC had a shorter overall survival than those with NSCLC-like LCNEC despite higher response rate (RR) to chemotherapy. Furthermore, treatment with etoposide-platinum was associated with superior response and survival in SCLC-like LCNEC compared with pemetrexed-platinum and gemcitabine/taxane-platinum doublets, while treatment with gemcitabine/taxane-platinum led to a shorter survival compared with etoposide-platinum or pemetrexed-platinum in patients with NSCLC-like LCNEC.

Conclusions: Genomic subtyping has potential in prognostication and therapeutic decision-making for patients with LCNEC and cfDNA analysis may be a reliable alternative for genomic profiling of LCNEC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest:

Y.F.G., Y.Q.W., L.P.C., Y.H.G., L.Y., and X.Y are current employees of Geneplus-Beijing. J.V.H. is a consultant for AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Medivation, ARIAD, Synta, Oncomed, Novartis, Genentech, and Calithera Biosciences, holds stock in Cardinal Spine LLC and Bio-Tree, and has received funding from AstraZeneca. I.I.W. receives honoraria from Roche/Genentech, Ventana, GlaxoSmithKline, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Synta Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medscape, Clovis, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer, and research support from Roche/Genentech, Oncoplex, and HGT. J.Z. serves as a consultant for AstraZeneca and Geneplus-Beijing and received honoraria and funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Roche, OrigiMed, Innovent, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck & Co. and Adaptive Biotechnologies Inc. outside the submitted work. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Cancer gene mutation landscape of LCNEC tumors from BJ-Cohort derived from NGS of tumor DNA(n=28) (A) and cfDNA(n=39) (B).
Patients were arranged along the x-axis. Mutation burden (number of mutations) is shown in the upper panel. Genes with somatic mutations detected in more than one patient were shown. Mutation frequencies of each gene were shown on the left.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Cancer gene mutations detected in paired tumor DNA and cfDNA from 20 patients.
Genes with somatic mutations are listed on the x-axis, and samples are shown on the y-axis. Mutations detected in tumor tissue DNA only, in cfDNA only or shared were shown in blue, red and orange, respectively.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Genomic subtyping was associated with response to different chemotherapy regimens.
DCR: disease control (complete response + partial response + stable disease) rate. RR: response (complete response + partial response) rate. Criterion 1: LCNEC tumors with RB1+TP53 co-alterations were classified as SCLC-like LCNEC (n=15), otherwise as NSCLC-like (n=) (39). Criterion 2: LCNEC tumors harboring any of the following alterations: RB1 mutation or loss, PTEN loss/mutation, FGFR1/FGFR4 mutation/amplification, TP53 loss were classified as SCLC-like LCNEC (n=27), otherwise as NSCLC-like (n=27). SCLC-PE: etoposide-platinum doublets. NSCLC-GEM/TAX: gemcitabine or taxane-platinum doublets. NSCLC-PEM: pemetrexed-platinum doublets. Note: Only 2 SCLC-like LCNEC patients based on criterion 1 were treated with NSCLC-GEX/TAX, who were not included in the statistical analysis.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Genomic subtyping was associated with survival of LCNEC patients treated with different chemotherapy regimens.
A-D: the genomic subtyping was based on the presence (SCLC-like) or absence (NSCLC-Like) of co-alterations in TP53 and RB1 (Criterion 1). E-H: the genomic subtyping was based on the presence (SCLC-like) or absence (NSCLC-Like) of any of the following alterations: RB1 mutation or loss, PTEN loss/mutation, FGFR1/FGFR4 mutation/amplification, TP53 loss (Criterion 2). SCLC-PE: etoposide-platinum doublets. NSCLC-GEM/TAX: gemcitabine or taxane-platinum doublets. NSCLC-PEM: pemetrexed-platinum doublets. 54 patients with first line chemotherapy were included in survival analysis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Travis WD, Linnoila RI, Tsokos MG, Hitchcock CL, Cutler GB Jr., Nieman L, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung with proposed criteria for large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. An ultrastructural, immunohistochemical, and flow cytometric study of 35 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1991;15(6):529–53. - PubMed
    1. Derks JL, Hendriks LE, Buikhuisen WA, Groen HJ, Thunnissen E, van Suylen RJ, et al. Clinical features of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a population-based overview. Eur Respir J 2016;47(2):615–24 doi 10.1183/13993003.00618-2015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Burke AP, Marx A, Nicholson AG. Introduction to The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus, and Heart. Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer 2015;10(9):1240–2 doi 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000663. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Asamura H, Kameya T, Matsuno Y, Noguchi M, Tada H, Ishikawa Y, et al. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the lung: a prognostic spectrum. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006;24(1):70–6 doi 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.1202. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones MH, Virtanen C, Honjoh D, Miyoshi T, Satoh Y, Okumura S, et al. Two prognostically significant subtypes of high-grade lung neuroendocrine tumours independent of small-cell and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas identified by gene expression profiles. Lancet 2004;363(9411):775–81 doi 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15693-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms