Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 7;14(11):e0224864.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224864. eCollection 2019.

Winter nitrification in ice-covered lakes

Affiliations

Winter nitrification in ice-covered lakes

Emily Cavaliere et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

With changes in ice cover duration, nutrient loading, and anoxia risk, it is important to understand the mechanisms that control nitrogen cycling and oxygen depletion in lakes through winter. Current understanding is largely limited to description of changes in chemistry, with few measurements of the processes driving winter changes, how they differ across lakes, and how they are impacted by under-ice conditions. Nitrification is a process which consumes oxygen and ammonium (NH4+), and supplies nitrate (NO3-). To date, nitrification has been measured under ice cover in only two lakes globally. Here, we used 15NH4+ enrichment to measure rates of pelagic nitrification in thirteen water bodies in two ecozones. Our work demonstrates ecologically important rates of nitrification can occur despite low water temperatures, impacting NH4+, NO3- and, most importantly, oxygen concentrations. However, high rates are not the norm. When, where and why is nitrification important in winter? We found that nitrification rates were highest in a eutrophic lake chain downstream of a wastewater treatment effluent (mean: 226.5 μg N L-1 d-1), and in a semi-saline prairie lake (110.0 μg N L-1 d-1). In the boreal shield, a eutrophic lake had nitrification rates exceeding those of an oligotrophic lake by 6-fold. Supplementing our results with literature data we found NH4+ concentrations were the strongest predictor of nitrification rates across lentic ecosystems in winter. Higher nitrification rates were associated with higher concentrations of NH4+, NO3- and nitrous oxide (N2O). While more work is required to understand the switch between high and low nitrification rates and strengthen our understanding of winter nitrogen cycling, this work demonstrates that high nitrification rates can occur in winter.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Schematic of the nitrogen cycle, featuring the microbial processes of nitrification (NH4+ to NO2 and then to NO3) and denitrification (NO3 to NO2, nitric oxide, N2O then to nitrogen gas).
For every mole of NH4+ nitrified to NO3, two moles of oxygen are consumed (Stoichiometric relationships collectively found in [,,–13]). Note that the proportion of N2O released from nitrification and denitrification is highly variable as indicated by the dashed arrows [14]. Nitrogen assimilation, dissimilatory NO3 reduction to NH4+ (DNRA) and anaerobic NH4+ oxidation (anammox) are excluded from the figure but may be important components of the nitrogen cycle [15].
Fig 2
Fig 2. Map of Canada with overlays of Saskatchewan and Ontario study sites (map courtesy of Rosa Brannen).
All Saskatchewan sites are in the prairie ecozone, while the Experimental Lakes area sites are in the boreal shield ecozone [42].
Fig 3
Fig 3. Relationship between nitrification rates and NH4+ concentrations for water bodies from this study (ELA and Saskatchewan) and other cold water measurements from Lake Superior (no ice-cover; [40]), Lake St. George (ice-covered; [21]) and Lake Croche (ice-covered; [38]).
Note logged y-axis. The line plotted is the linear model (permutations) for all data from Tables 1 and 2. The linear model and statistics are presented in Table 3. Nitrification rates less than their sample specific LOQ are replaced by their LOQ.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Concentrations of NH4+ and NO3, and N2O percent saturation partitioned according to nitrification rates that are above or below 0.11 μg N L-1 d-1.
There are significant differences between the two rate groups for all analyses (NH4+, NO3, and N2O; Wilcox-Mann-Whitney test, P <0.05). The boxplot and whiskers encompass 95% of the data observed, data points outside of the box and whiskers are outliers. The box itself represents the first and third quartiles, and the center line is the median [65].
Fig 5
Fig 5. Principal component analysis showing the relationship between measured variables and nitrification rates.
PC1 and PC2 account for 61% of the variance exhibited by the relationship among these variables. Within a PCA, the closer the component vectors are (angle and length) the more closely they are related. Note the association of nitrification rates with NO3, N2O and NH4+, and of CH4 with chlorophyll and temperature.

References

    1. Galloway JN, Townsend AR, Erisman JW, Bekunda M, Cai Z, Freney JR, et al. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science. 2008;320: 889–892. 10.1126/science.1136674 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley AN, Smith VH, et al. Nonpoint Pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol Appl. 1998;8: 559–568. 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO;2 - DOI
    1. Leavitt PR, Brock CS, Ebel C, Patoine A. Landscape-scale effects of urban nitrogen on a chain of freshwater lakes in central North America. Limnol Oceanogr. 2006;51: 2262–2277. 10.4319/lo.2006.51.5.2262 - DOI
    1. Ribot M, Martí E, von Schiller D, Sabater F, Daims H, Battin TJ. Nitrogen processing and the role of epilithic biofilms downstream of a wastewater treatment plant. Freshw Sci. 2012;31: 1057–1069. 10.1899/11-161.1 - DOI
    1. Ward BB, Olson RJ, Perry MJ. Microbial nitrification rates in the primary nitrite maximum off southern California. Deep Sea Res Part A Oceanogr Res Pap. 1982;29: 247–255. 10.1016/0198-0149(82)90112-1 - DOI

Publication types