Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Nov 6;9(11):e029480.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029480.

Phase II randomised control feasibility trial of a nutrition and physical activity intervention after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase II randomised control feasibility trial of a nutrition and physical activity intervention after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

Lucy E Hackshaw-McGeagh et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Dietary factors and physical activity may alter prostate cancer progression. We explored the feasibility of lifestyle interventions following radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer.

Design: Patients were recruited into a presurgical observational cohort; following radical prostatectomy, they were offered randomisation into a 2×3 factorial randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Setting: A single National Health Service trust in the South West of England, UK.

Participants: Those with localised prostate cancer and listed for radical prostatectomy were invited to participate.

Randomisation: Random allocation was performed by the Bristol Randomised Trial Collaboration via an online system.

Interventions: Men were randomised into both a modified nutrition group (either increased vegetable and fruit, and reduced dairy milk; or lycopene supplementation; or control) and a physical activity group (brisk walking or control) for 6 months.

Blinding: Only the trial statistician was blind to allocations.

Primary outcome measures: Primary outcomes were measures of feasibility: randomisation rates and intervention adherence at 6 months. Collected at trial baseline, three and six months, with daily adherence reported throughout. Our intended adherence rate was 75% or above, the threshold for acceptable adherence was 90%.

Results: 108 men entered the presurgical cohort, and 81 were randomised into the postsurgical RCT (randomisation rate: 93.1%) and 75 completed the trial. Of 25 men in the nutrition intervention, 10 (40.0%; 95% CI 23.4% to 59.3%) adhered to the fruit and vegetable recommendations and 18 (72.0%; 95% CI 52.4% to 85.7%) to reduced dairy intake. Adherence to lycopene (n=28), was 78.6% (95% CI 60.5% to 89.8%), while 21/39 adhered to the walking intervention (53.8%; 95% CI 38.6% to 68.4%). Most men were followed up at 6 months (75/81; 92.6%). Three 'possibly related' adverse events were indigestion, abdominal bloating and knee pain.

Conclusions: Interventions were deemed feasible, with high randomisation rates and generally good adherence. A definitive RCT is proposed.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN 99048944.

Keywords: clinical trials; preventive medicine; prostate disease; surgery; urological tumours; urology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram. CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; FU, follow-up; PA, physical activity; RCT, randomised controlled trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Weekly adherence to the intervention from 0 to 26 weeks for participants randomised to the lycopene (A) or plant-based diet (B) arms of the nutrition intervention and physical activity intervention arm (C).Dashed vertical lines represent timepoints (weeks 1, 2, 8, 13, 15 and 18) at which reminders were sent to participants.

References

    1. Cancer Research UK Prostate cancer statistics, 2019. Available: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/st...
    1. Hackshaw-McGeagh LE, Perry RE, Leach VA, et al. . A systematic review of dietary, nutritional, and physical activity interventions for the prevention of prostate cancer progression and mortality. Cancer Causes Control 2015;26:1521–50. 10.1007/s10552-015-0659-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Cancer Research Fund Continuous update project report: diet, nutrition, physical activity and prostate cancer, 2014.
    1. Chan JM, Holick CN, Leitzmann MF, et al. . Diet after diagnosis and the risk of prostate cancer progression, recurrence, and death (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2006;17:199–208. 10.1007/s10552-005-0413-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neill MG, Fleshner NE. An update on chemoprevention strategies in prostate cancer for 2006. Curr Opin Urol 2006;16:132–7. 10.1097/01.mou.0000193388.31727.d2 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources