Is PFNA-II a better implant for stable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly population ? A prospective randomized study
- PMID: 31700206
- PMCID: PMC6823828
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.02.004
Is PFNA-II a better implant for stable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly population ? A prospective randomized study
Erratum in
-
Erratum regarding previously published articles.J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Nov-Dec;11(6):1169-1171. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.09.032. Epub 2020 Sep 26. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020. PMID: 33013141 Free PMC article.
-
Erratum regarding previously published articles.J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Aug 5;21:101557. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101557. eCollection 2021 Oct. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021. PMID: 34414071 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Introduction: Intertrochanteric fracture is one of the most common and severe fractures occurring in the elderly population. We conducted a randomized prospective study to compare the functional and radiological outcome of Proximal Femoral Nail anti-rotation-Asia(PFNA-II) and Dynamic Hip screw (DHS) used in fixation of stable (AO type 31 A1-A2.1) intertrochanteric fractures in elderly.
Methods: 60 elderly patients with stable intertrochanteric fractures treated with DHS and PFNA-II between August 2014 to Dec 2016 were enrolled in the study. Intraoperative variables-surgical time, blood loss, fluoroscopy time and post-operative variables-union rate, change in neck shaft angle(NSA), functional outcome in terms of Modified Harris Hip Score(HHS) & SF-12, complication rate and mortality at one year were studied and compared between both the groups.
Results: The mean age of patients in our study was 70.96 years. We found patients treated with DHS required significantly longer surgical time and had more blood loss compared to PFNA-II group. However, there was no significant difference in both the groups in terms of intra-operative fluoroscopy time, change in neck shaft angle, union rate, complication rate and Modified Harris Hip Score & SF-12 at three months; six months and one year follow-up.
Conclusions: Both DHS and PFNA-II can be used effectively in the treatment of elderly patients with stable intertrochanteric fracture with comparable outcome. However, in high-risk elderly patients requiring shorter surgical time and less blood loss, PFNA-II can be used.
Keywords: DHS; Elderly; Intertrochanteric fractures; PFNA-II.
© 2019 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.
Figures



References
-
- Pajarinen J., Lindahl J., Michelsson O., Savolainen V., Hirvensalo E. Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a dynamic hip screw or a proximal femoral nail. Bone Jt J. 2005 Jan 1;87–B(1):76–81. - PubMed
-
- Zeng C., Wang Y.R., Wei J. Treatment of trochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation or dynamic hip screw systems: a meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2012;40(3):839–851. - PubMed
-
- Dhamangaonkar A.C., Joshi D., Goregaonkar A.B., Tawari A.A. Proximal femoral locking plate versus dynamic hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures. J Orthop Surg. 2013;21(3):317. - PubMed
-
- Zuo W., Dai Z., Tian J. Comparison of therapeutic effect of PFNA with DHS in intertrochanteric fractures. China J Mod Med. 2011;4:026.
-
- Klinger H.M., Baums M.H., Eckert M., Neugebauer R. [A comparative study of unstable per- and intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with dynamic hip screw (DHS) and trochanteric butt-press plate vs. proximal femoral nail (PFN)] Zentralblatt Für Chir. 2005 Aug;130(4):301–306. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials