Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 16;5(4):216-226.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2019.05.002. eCollection 2019 Sep.

New changes in pregnancy and lactation labelling: Review of dermatologic drugs

Affiliations

New changes in pregnancy and lactation labelling: Review of dermatologic drugs

Yun Pei Koh et al. Int J Womens Dermatol. .

Abstract

Background: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has published new pregnancy and lactation labelling rules that set standards on the presentation of information with regard to drug usage during pregnancy and breastfeeding, as well as the effects on fertility. These guidelines became effective June 30, 2015, and classified the risks of using prescription drugs during pregnancy in three detailed subsections: Pregnancy, Lactation, and Females and Males of Reproductive Potential. These sections describe the risks within a real-world context of caring for these patients.

Objective: In this study, we reclassified and categorized drugs and treatments commonly used in dermatology according to these new guidelines.

Methods: We performed a search of the medical literature about the use of relevant prescription drugs during pregnancy and breastfeeding and their effect on fertility. The search included prospective and retrospective studies, review articles from PubMed-indexed journals (from inception to November 2018), U.S. Food and Drug Administration records, pregnancy exposure registries, relevant information and studies provided in drug labeling by companies, and updated pharmacologic texts and guidelines up to 2018.

Results: Topical immunomodulators, systemic immunomodulators (including biologics), systemic antipruritic agents, antimicrobials, as well as acne, hair, and cosmetic agents were included. We have made best attempts to review and consolidate existing and new data and include them in our guide.

Conclusion: This new narrative format facilitates prescribing by considering a variety of factors. One previously overlooked aspect was the impact on the reproductive potential of both male and female patients. Rather than depending on overly simplistic letter risk categories, dermatologists will now need to make prescribing decisions based on each patient and the information provided, which will allow for better decision making and patient care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmed A.R., Gurcan H.M. Use of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy during pregnancy in patients with pemphigus vulgaris. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25:1073–1079. - PubMed
    1. Autret E., Berjot M., Jonville-béra A.P., Aubry M.C., Moraine C. Anophthalmia and agenesis of optic chiasma associated with adapalene gel in early pregnancy. Lancet. 1997;350(9074):339. - PubMed
    1. Baker H.W., Straffon W.G., McGowan M.P., Burger H.G., De Kretser D.M., Hudson B. A controlled trial of the use of erythromycin for men with asthenospermia. Int J Androl. 1984;7(5):383–388. - PubMed
    1. Bandoli G., Palmsten K., Forbess Smith C.J., Chambers C.D. A review of systemic corticosteroid use in pregnancy and the risk of select pregnancy and birth outcomes. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 2017;43(3):489–502. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Both T., Van Laar J.A., Bonte-Mineur F., Van Hagen P.M., Van Daele P.L. Colchicine has no negative effect on fertility and pregnancy. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(12):A4196. - PubMed