Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar;59(3):287-296.
doi: 10.1007/s40262-019-00837-2.

Setting the Dose of Checkpoint Inhibitors: The Role of Clinical Pharmacology

Affiliations
Review

Setting the Dose of Checkpoint Inhibitors: The Role of Clinical Pharmacology

Etienne Chatelut et al. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy is based on checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) that significantly improve the clinical outcome of several malignant diseases. These inhibitors are monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed at cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), sharing most of the clinical pharmacokinetic characteristics of mAb targeted therapies, all of which differ from those of cytotoxics and small molecules. Establishing the labeled dose of mAbs, and particularly of the CPIs, represents a true challenge. This review therefore examines the main criteria used for dose selection, along with their limits. The relationships between CPI pharmacokinetic parameters and treatment outcome (efficacy and/or toxicity) differ somewhat among the various drugs, but general features can be identified. Nevertheless, the interpretation of these relationships remains quite controversial. A first interpretation asserts that inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability in clearance has an impact on outcome and should be taken into consideration for dosing individualization. The second considers that higher clearance values observed in some patients result from characteristics associated with poor predictive factors of efficacy. Finally, the schedule, and particularly its frequency of administration, merits rethinking.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2019 Jun;8(6):415-427 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 28;366(26):2455-65 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;57 Suppl 10:S26-S42 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020 Feb;59(2):217-227 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Sep;49(9):1012-24 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources