Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;31(1):61-69.
doi: 10.1111/jce.14269. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

Local impedance guides catheter ablation in patients with ventricular tachycardia

Paula Münkler  1   2 , Melanie A Gunawardene  1   3 , Christiane Jungen  1   2 , Niklas Klatt  1   2 , Jana M Schwarzl  1 , Ruken Ö Akbulak  1 , Leon Dinshaw  1 , Jens Hartmann  1   3 , Mario Jularic  1   3 , Ann-Kathrin Kahle  1 , René Riedel  4 , Lydia Merbold  5 , Christian Eickholt  1   3   2 , Stephan Willems  1   3   2 , Christian Meyer  1   2
Affiliations

Local impedance guides catheter ablation in patients with ventricular tachycardia

Paula Münkler et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Aims: Catheter contact and local tissue characteristics are relevant information for successful radiofrequency current (RFC)-ablation. Local impedance (LI) has been shown to reflect tissue characteristics and lesion formation during RFC-ablation. Using a novel ablation catheter incorporating three mini-electrodes, we investigated LI in relation to generator impedance (GI) in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and its applicability as an indicator of effective RFC-ablation.

Methods and results: Baseline impedance, Δimpedance during ablation and drop rate (Δimpedance/time) were analyzed for 625 RFC-applications in 28 patients with recurrent VT undergoing RFC-ablation. LI was lower in scarred (87.0 Ω [79.0-95.0]) compared to healthy myocardium (97.5 Ω ([82.75-111.50]; P = .03) while GI did not differ between scarred and healthy myocardium. ΔLI was higher (18 Ω [9.4-26.0]) for VT-terminating as compared to non-terminating RFC-ablation (ΔLI 13 Ω [8.85-18.0]; P = .03), but did not differ for ΔGI between terminating vs nonterminating RFC-ablation. Correspondingly, LI drop rate was higher for RFC-ablation terminating the VT compared with RFC-ablation not terminating the VT (0.63 Ω/s [0.52-0.76] vs 0.32 Ω [0.20-0.58]; P = .008) while there was no difference for GI drop rate. ΔLI was higher in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy vs patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (16 Ω [11.0-20.0] vs 11.0 Ω [7.85-17.00]; P = .003).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that LI is a sensitive parameter to guide RFC-ablation in patients with VT. LI indicates differences in tissue characteristics and generally is higher in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Hence, the etiology of the underlying cardiomyopathy needs to be considered when adopting LI for monitoring catheter ablation of VT.

Keywords: catheter ablation; electrical impedance; high-density mapping; radiofrequency; ventricular tachycardia.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Harvey M, Kim YN, Sousa J, et al. Impedance monitoring during radiofrequency catheter ablation in humans. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992;15:22-27.
    1. Knecht S, Reichlin T, Pavlovic N, et al. Contact force and impedance decrease during ablation depends on catheter location and orientation: insights from pulmonary vein isolation using a contact force-sensing catheter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;43:297-306.
    1. Fallert MA, Mirotznik MS, Downing SW, et al. Myocardial electrical impedance mapping of ischemic sheep hearts and healing aneurysms. Circulation. 1993;87:199-207.
    1. Jacobson JT, Hutchinson MD, Cooper JM, Woo YJ, Shandler RS, Callans DJ. Tissue-specific variability in human epicardial impedance. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22:436-439.
    1. Sperelakis N, Hoshito T. Electrical impedance of cardiac muscle. Circ Res. 1961;9:1280-1283.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources