Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Nov;98(45):e17810.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017810.

Therapeutic effect of kyphoplasty and balloon vertebroplasty on osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Therapeutic effect of kyphoplasty and balloon vertebroplasty on osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Yi Zhu et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the treatment effects of kyphoplasty (KP) compared with percutaneous vertebroplasty (VP) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture, based on evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: The electronic databases PubMed (from 1966), EmBase (from 1974), and Cochrane Library (including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Reviews) were searched systematically to identify relevant studies published up to August 31, 2019. Meta-analyses were conducted for subjective pain as measured using visual analogue scale (VAS), disability function as measured by Oswestry disability index (ODI), and cement leakage. For VAS and ODI, mean change from the baseline and standard deviation were used; for cement leakage, numbers of events and patients in each group were used. The random-effects model was applied to summarize the effects across trials.

Results: Previous reviews and meta-analysis included non-RCTs, which brought (for those studies) a higher risk of bias. Therefore, 6 RCTs involving 1077 patients were included in the meta-analysis. No between-group difference was found. The weighted mean difference was -0.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.39-0.01; P = .057) for VAS and -3.51 (95% CI, -8.70-1.67; P = .184) for ODI. However, KP had numerically lower rates of cement leakage across trials in a consistent fashion (relative risk, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94; P = .004).

Conclusions: Both KP and VP had clinically meaningful beneficial effects on pain and disability, and the effects were stable and similar. KP had significantly fewer cement leakages.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study selection and inclusion process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A and B) Cochrane risk-of-bias evaluations.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot showing the WMD estimates for VAS. KP = kyphoplasty, VAS = visual analogue scale, VP = vertebroplasty, WMD = weighted mean difference.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot showing the WMD estimates for ODI. KP = kyphoplasty, ODI = Oswestry disability index, VP = vertebroplasty, WMD = weighted mean difference.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot showing the risk ratio estimates for cement leakage. CI = confidence interval, KP = kyphoplasty, RR = relative risk, VP = vertebroplasty.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Sensitivity analysis of the standardized mean difference estimates for pain. CI = confidence interval, KP = kyphoplasty, VP = vertebroplasty.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Funnel plot for publication bias test of VAS outcome. VAS = visual analogue scale, WMD = weighted mean difference.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Funnel plot for publication bias test of ODI outcome. ODI = Oswestry disability index, WMD = weighted mean difference
Figure 9
Figure 9
Funnel plot for publication bias test of cement leakage outcome. RR = relative risk.

References

    1. Ettinger B, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. Contribution of vertebral deformities to chronic back pain and disability. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:449–56. - PubMed
    1. Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, et al. Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Working Party for Quality of Life of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1999;10:150–60. - PubMed
    1. Felsenberg D, Silman AJ, Lunt M, et al. EPOS. Incidence of vertebral fracture in Europe: Results From the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). J Bone Miner Res 2002;17:716–24. - PubMed
    1. Qian J, Yang H, Jing J, et al. The early stage adjacent disc degeneration after percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic VCFs. PLoS One 2012;7:e46323. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lad SP, Patil CG, Lad EM, Boakye M. Trends in pathological vertebral fractures in the United States: 1993 to 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;7:305–10. - PubMed