Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 7;16(22):4342.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224342.

Efficacy of an Ethanol-Based Hand Sanitizer for the Disinfection of Blood Pressure Cuffs

Lucia Grandiere Perez  1 , Céline Ramanantsoa  2 , Aurélie Beaudron  2 , Cyril Hoche Delchet  2 , Pascale Penn  2 , Pauline Comacle  2
Affiliations

Efficacy of an Ethanol-Based Hand Sanitizer for the Disinfection of Blood Pressure Cuffs

Lucia Grandiere Perez et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Blood pressure cuffs (BP cuffs) have been implicated in some nosocomial outbreaks. We compared the efficacy of an ethanol-based hand sanitizer (EBHS) with a detergent/disinfectant for the disinfection of BP cuffs. The inner sides of 30 BP cuffs were sampled for bacterial culture. Then, the same area was divided into halves. One half was disinfected by a detergent/disinfectant and the other was disinfected by an EBHS. The bacterial count decreased significantly with both disinfectants (p < 0.0001 compared with before disinfection). The bacterial count decrease seemed greater with the EBHS compared with the detergent/disinfectant, but the difference was not significant. Therefore, within the limits of a single application, the EBHS was an efficacious means of BP cuff disinfection. However, the repeated exposure to emollients contained in EBHS may require further studies before validating these results.

Keywords: blood pressure cuff; disinfection; ethanol; hand rub; hand sanitizer; sphygmomanometer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of bacteria colony forming units on 30 blood pressure cuffs, before and after disinfection with the detergent/disinfectant or the ethanol-based hand sanitizer.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. De Gialluly C., Morange V., De Gialluly E., Loulergue J., Van Der Mee N., Quentin R. Blood Pressure Cuff as a Potential Vector of Pathogenic Microorganisms a Prospective Study in a Teaching Hospital. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2006;27:940–943. doi: 10.1086/507284. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manian F.A., Meyer L., Jenne J. Clostridium difficile Contamination of Blood Pressure Cuffs: A Call for a Closer Look at Gloving Practices in the Era of Universal Precautions. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 1996;17:180–182. - PubMed
    1. Bonten M.J., Hayden M.K., Nathan C., Van Voorhis J., Matushek M., Slaughter S., Rice T., Weinstein R.A. Epidemiology of colonisation of patients and environment with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Lancet. 1996;348:1615–1619. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)02331-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hwang Y.S., Brinton B.G., Leonard R.B., Blue S.R., Woods M.L., Carroll K.C. Investigation of an outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a low prevalence university hospital. J. Investig. Med. 1998;46:435–443. - PubMed
    1. Layton M.C., Pérez M., Heald P., Patterson J.E. An Outbreak of Mupirocin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus on a Dermatology Ward Associated with an Environmental Reservoir. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 1993;14:369–375. doi: 10.2307/30148318. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms