Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;51(1):303-312.
doi: 10.1007/s42770-019-00147-6. Epub 2019 Nov 9.

Dynamics of microbial contaminants is driven by selection during ethanol production

Affiliations

Dynamics of microbial contaminants is driven by selection during ethanol production

Luciano Lopes Queiroz et al. Braz J Microbiol. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Brazil is the second largest ethanol producer in the world and largest using sugarcane feedstock. Bacteria contamination is one of the most important issues faced by ethanol producers that seek to increase production efficiency. Each step of production is a selection event due to the environmental and biological changes that occur. Therefore, we evaluated the influence of the selection arising from the ethanol production process on diversity and composition of bacteria. Our objectives were to test two hypotheses, (1) that species richness will decrease during the production process and (2) that lactic acid bacteria will become dominant with the advance of ethanol production. Bacterial community assemblage was accessed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing from 19 sequential samples. Temperature is of great importance in shaping microbial communities. Species richness increased between the decanter and must steps of the process. Low Simpson index values were recorded at the fermentation step, indicating a high dominance of Lactobacillus. Interactions between Lactobacillus and yeast may be impairing the efficiency of industrial ethanol production.

Keywords: Distillery; Ethanolic fermentation; Microbial ecology; Selection; Sugarcane.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Arrangement of the main ethanol production steps. Red dots show the steps sampled
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Observed richness in each step of ethanol production
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relative abundance of the main genera found in each step of ethanol production
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Heatmap of the 20 most abundant OTUs found in each step of ethanol production
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix for the samples of ethanol production process

References

    1. Lopes ML, Paulillo SC d L, Godoy A, et al. Ethanol production in Brazil: a bridge between science and industry. Braz J Microbiol. 2016;47:64–76. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.10.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amorim HV, Lopes ML, De Castro Oliveira JV, et al. Scientific challenges of bioethanol production in Brazil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;91:1267–1275. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3437-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basso L, Basso T, Rocha S. Ethanol production in Brazil: the industrial process and its impact on yeast fermentation. Biofuel Prod - Recent Dev Prospect. 2011;1530:85–100. doi: 10.5772/959. - DOI
    1. Costa OYA, Souto BM, Tupinambá DD, et al. Microbial diversity in sugarcane ethanol production in a Brazilian distillery using a culture-independent method. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;42:73–84. doi: 10.1007/s10295-014-1533-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bischoff KM, Liu S, Leathers TD, et al. Modeling bacterial contamination of fuel ethanol fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;103:117–122. doi: 10.1002/bit.22244. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources