Semiautomated optical coherence tomography-guided robotic surgery for porcine lens removal
- PMID: 31706519
- PMCID: PMC6941892
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.06.020
Semiautomated optical coherence tomography-guided robotic surgery for porcine lens removal
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate semiautomated surgical lens extraction procedures using the optical coherence tomography (OCT)-integrated Intraocular Robotic Interventional Surgical System.
Setting: Stein Eye Institute and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Design: Experimental study.
Methods: Semiautomated lens extraction was performed on postmortem pig eyes using a robotic platform integrated with an OCT imaging system. Lens extraction was performed using a series of automated steps including robot-to-eye alignment, irrigation/aspiration (I/A) handpiece insertion, anatomic modeling, surgical path planning, and I/A handpiece navigation. Intraoperative surgical supervision and human intervention were enabled by real-time OCT image feedback to the surgeon via a graphical user interface. Manual preparation of the pig-eye models, including the corneal incision and capsulorhexis, was performed by a trained cataract surgeon before the semiautomated lens extraction procedures. A scoring system was used to assess surgical complications in a postoperative evaluation.
Results: Complete lens extraction was achieved in 25 of 30 eyes. In the remaining 5 eyes, small lens pieces (≤1.0 mm3) were detected near the lens equator, where transpupillary OCT could not image. No posterior capsule rupture or corneal leakage occurred. The mean surgical duration was 277 seconds ± 42 (SD). Based on a 3-point scale (0 = no damage), damage to the iris was 0.33 ± 0.20, damage to the cornea was 1.47 ± 0.20 (due to tissue dehydration), and stress at the incision was 0.97 ± 0.11.
Conclusions: No posterior capsule rupture was reported. Complete lens removal was achieved in 25 trials without significant surgical complications. Refinements to the procedures are required before fully automated lens extraction can be realized.
Copyright © 2019 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2012. May 1; 96(5):614–8. - PubMed
-
- Donaldson KE, Braga-Mele R, Cabot F, Davidson R, Dhaliwal DK, Hamilton R et al. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 2013. November 1; 39(11):1753–63. - PubMed
-
- Palanker D, Schuele G, Friedman N, Andersen D, Culbertson W. Cataract surgery with OCT-guided femtosecond laser. In Bio-Optics: Design and Application 2011 Apr 4 (p. BTuC4). Optical Society of America
-
- Roberts TV, Lawless M, Bali SJ, Hodge C, Sutton G. Surgical outcomes and safety of femtosecond laser cataract surgery: a prospective study of 1500 consecutive cases. Ophthalmology 2013. February 1; 120(2):227–33. - PubMed
-
- Gimbel HV. Posterior capsule tears using phaco-emulsification causes, prevention and management. European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery 1990. March; 2(1):63–69.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
