Clinical evaluation of diagnostic hemoperfusion for in vivo enrichment of bacteria and fungi in comparison with a conventional blood culture technique

Abstract

The hemoperfusion module, a newly developed technique for recovering pathogenic microorganisms from patients suffering from septicemia, was compared with conventional blood cultures. The module was interconnected with the extracorporeal circulation of 92 predominantly hemodialyzed patients. Nearly 12 liters of flowing blood (up to 200 ml min-1; mean running time, 60 min) came in contact with the coated charcoal. Of 99 modules examined, 44 (44.7%) yielded positive cultures and contained 54 potentially pathogenic bacteria or fungi (22 species). Only 32 of 190 (16.8%) conventional blood cultures were positive and contained 37 microorganisms (10 species). Even when patients were receiving antibiotic treatment, the frequency of isolation was significantly higher in hemoperfusion (21 of 44 modules positive, 47.7%) than in conventional blood cultures (10 of 88 cultures positive, 11.4%). In contrast, 23 of 55 modules (41.8%) and 22 of 102 conventional blood cultures (21.6%) were positive when patients were not treated with antibiotics prior to blood sampling. Altogether, hemoperfusion modules appeared to be superior to and more sensitive than the conventional blood cultures used and seemed to be a valuable tool for detecting septicemia.