Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov 9;23(11):86.
doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0821-x.

Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain: Current Treatment Strategies and Future Options-a Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain: Current Treatment Strategies and Future Options-a Literature Review

Lei Zhao et al. Curr Pain Headache Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Many studies have demonstrated that discogenic low back pain is the most common type of chronic low back pain (CLBP), one of the major causes of disability, and has a major socioeconomic impact. Our aim is to review present therapeutic interventions for discogenic low back pain.

Recent findings: There are a multitude of treatments used in clinical practice to treat CLBP, but there is continued debate and lack of consensus among clinicians and the policy makers as to which modality is the best approach. Based on controlled evaluations, lumbar intervertebral discs have been shown to be the source of chronic back pain without disc herniation in 26 to 39% of patients. Treatment modalities include noninvasive treatments such as drug therapy, multiple physical modalities, and multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation; interventional modalities such as intradiscal therapies and epidural injections; and regenerative modalities with disc injections of various solutions; and, finally, surgical approaches such as fusion and artificial disc replacement, all of which are accompanied by significant discussion, limited evidence, and lack of consensus. The results of this evaluation show that the evidence for drug therapy in chronic discogenic low back pain is limited; for multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation, it is moderate; and for multiple physical and behavioral therapies, the evidence is limited. For intradiscal therapies, it is poor; for epidural injections, it is moderate; and for regenerative therapies, evidence levels of 3 to 4. The evidence for surgical fusions and disc replacement is similar, without superiority when compared with multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation, well-designed physical therapy, or epidural injections.

Keywords: Degeneration; Diagnosis; Discogenic low back pain; Intervertebral disc; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 1;30(21):2369-77; discussion 2378 - PubMed
    1. Pain Physician. 2019 Mar;22(2):119-138 - PubMed
    1. Pain Physician. 2018 May;21(3):209-218 - PubMed
    1. Pain Physician. 2018 Sep;21(5):449-468 - PubMed
    1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 02;(9):CD000963 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts