Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;30(2):515-520.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04203-w.

Management of leak after sleeve gastrectomy: outcomes of 73 cases, treatment algorithm and predictors of resolution

Affiliations

Management of leak after sleeve gastrectomy: outcomes of 73 cases, treatment algorithm and predictors of resolution

Moataz Bashah et al. Obes Surg. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Gastric leak post laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a severe complication that has been reported in 1.5-3% of cases. Management algorithms of leak exist; however, no known factors predict the time to resolution. This study aims to share outcomes of our management algorithm of post LSG leak, including the rate of resolution, complications, admission to the intensive care unit, conversion to other techniques, and mortality. To determine if any factors can predict the resolution time.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who had LSG leaks and was managed in the main tertiary center in Qatar (January 2012-December 2017).

Results: A total of seventy-three patients had post LSG leaks. Fifty-six (76.7%) underwent LSG outside our center. Thirteen leaks (17.8%) were after revisional LSG. Laparoscopic exploration was performed in twenty patients (27.4%) and feeding jejunostomy in nine patients (12.3%). Patients were followed up for 12 months. All healed within 8.8 ± 0.72 weeks. The resolution rate was (97.1%) without surgical conversion, while two patients required fistulo-jejunostomy. No patient died. Complications occurred; re-leak (14.9%) and splenic abscess (2.9%). Patients on jejunal feeding had shorter resolution time (HR = 2.7, P = 0.018), while patients on total parenteral nutrition and post-endoscopic dilatation had 66% and 50% increases in the resolution time; (HR = 0.34, P = 0.026) and (HR = 0.5, P = 0.047), respectively.

Conclusion: Management of post-LSG leak is multimodal. Our clinical experience demonstrated less urge to perform extensive surgical interventions. Patients on enteral feeding had shorter resolution time while patients with sleeve stricture had a longer time to resolution.

Keywords: Management of leak post sleeve gastrectomy; Post LSG leak complications; Predictors of resolution time.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Obes Surg. 2016 Jan;26(1):21-5 - PubMed
    1. Obes Surg. 2017 Jul;27(7):1780-1788 - PubMed
    1. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009 Jul-Aug;5(4):469-75 - PubMed
    1. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 Mar-Apr;4(2):152-7; discussion 157-8 - PubMed
    1. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 14;20(38):13904-10 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources