Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 10;18(1):171.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1074-3.

Defining 'actionable' high- costhealth care use: results using the Canadian Institute for Health Information population grouping methodology

Maureen Anderson  1   2 , Crawford W Revie  3   4 , Henrik Stryhn  3 , Cordell Neudorf  5   6 , Yvonne Rosehart  7 , Wenbin Li  8   9 , Meriç Osman  8 , David L Buckeridge  10 , Laura C Rosella  9   11   12   13 , Walter P Wodchis  9   12   13
Affiliations

Defining 'actionable' high- costhealth care use: results using the Canadian Institute for Health Information population grouping methodology

Maureen Anderson et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Background: A small proportion of the population consumes the majority of health care resources. High-cost health care users are a heterogeneous group. We aim to segment a provincial population into relevant homogenous sub-groups to provide actionable information on risk factors associated with high-cost health care use within sub-populations.

Methods: The Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) Population Grouping methodology was used to define mutually exclusive and clinically relevant health profile sub-groups. High-cost users (> = 90th percentile of health care spending) were defined within each sub-group. Univariate analyses explored demographic, socio-economic status, health status and health care utilization variables associated with high-cost use. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed for the costliest health profile groups.

Results: From 2015 to 2017, 1,175,147 individuals were identified for study. High-cost users consumed 41% of total health care resources. Average annual health care spending for individuals not high-cost were $642; high-cost users were $16,316. The costliest health profile groups were 'long-term care', 'palliative', 'major acute', 'major chronic', 'major cancer', 'major newborn', 'major mental health' and 'moderate chronic'. Both 'major acute' and 'major cancer' health profile groups were largely explained by measures of health care utilization and multi-morbidity. In the remaining costliest health profile groups modelled, 'major chronic', 'moderate chronic', 'major newborn' and 'other mental health', a measure of socio-economic status, low neighbourhood income, was statistically significantly associated with high-cost use.

Interpretation: Model results point to specific, actionable information within clinically meaningful subgroups to reduce high-cost health care use. Health equity, specifically low socio-economic status, was statistically significantly associated with high-cost use in the majority of health profile sub-groups. Population segmentation methods, and more specifically, the CIHI Population Grouping Methodology, provide specificity to high-cost health care use; informing interventions aimed at reducing health care costs and improving population health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study cohort inclusion/exclusion criteria
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csáki F, editors. 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory, Tsahkadsor, Armenia. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó; 1973;267–81.
    1. Aldridge MD, Kelley AS. The myth regarding the high cost of end-of-life care. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(12):2411. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302889. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36(1):1–10. doi: 10.2307/2137284. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson Maureen, Revie Crawford W., Quail Jacqueline M., Wodchis Walter, de Oliveira Claire, Osman Meriç, Baetz Marilyn, McClure J., Stryhn Henrik, Buckeridge David, Neudorf Cordell. The effect of socio-demographic factors on mental health and addiction high-cost use: a retrospective, population-based study in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2018;109(5-6):810–820. doi: 10.17269/s41997-018-0101-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Babitsch B, Gohl D, von Lengerke T. Re-revisiting Andersen’s behavioral model of health services use: a systematic review of studies from 1998–2011. Psychosoc Med. 2012;9. 10.3205/psm000089. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources