Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 5;105(6):1091-1101.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

TRIDENT-2: National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in the Netherlands

Affiliations

TRIDENT-2: National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in the Netherlands

Karuna R M van der Meij et al. Am J Hum Genet. .

Abstract

The Netherlands launched a nationwide implementation study on non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a first-tier test offered to all pregnant women. This started on April 1, 2017 as the TRIDENT-2 study, licensed by the Dutch Ministry of Health. In the first year, NIPT was performed in 73,239 pregnancies (42% of all pregnancies), 7,239 (4%) chose first-trimester combined testing, and 54% did not participate. The number of trisomies 21 (239, 0.33%), 18 (49, 0.07%), and 13 (55, 0.08%) found in this study is comparable to earlier studies, but the Positive Predictive Values (PPV)-96% for trisomy 21, 98% for trisomy 18, and 53% for trisomy 13-were higher than expected. Findings other than trisomy 21, 18, or 13 were reported on request of the pregnant women; 78% of women chose to have these reported. The number of additional findings was 207 (0.36%); these included other trisomies (101, 0.18%, PPV 6%, many of the remaining 94% of cases are likely confined placental mosaics and possibly clinically significant), structural chromosomal aberrations (95, 0.16%, PPV 32%,) and complex abnormal profiles indicative of maternal malignancies (11, 0.02%, PPV 64%). The implementation of genome-wide NIPT is under debate because the benefits of detecting other fetal chromosomal aberrations must be balanced against the risks of discordant positives, parental anxiety, and a potential increase in (invasive) diagnostic procedures. Our first-year data, including clinical data and laboratory follow-up data, will fuel this debate. Furthermore, we describe how NIPT can successfully be embedded into a national screening program with a single chain for prenatal care including counseling, testing, and follow-up.

Keywords: NIPS; NIPT; cfDNA; common trisomies; fetal trisomy; first tier test; genome-wide; implementation study; prenatal screening; rare autosomal trisomies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
NIPT Flow and Numbers for the Open and Targeted Cohorts n, number.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of Rare Autosomal Trisomies NIPT, non-invasive prenatal test; RAT, rare autosomal trisomy; T, trisomy
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of Structural Chromosomal Aberrations NIPT, non-invasive prenatal test; SA, structural chromosomal aberration

References

    1. Lo Y.M., Corbetta N., Chamberlain P.F., Rai V., Sargent I.L., Redman C.W., Wainscoat J.S. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet. 1997;350:485–487. - PubMed
    1. Chandrasekharan S., Minear M.A., Hung A., Allyse M. Noninvasive prenatal testing goes global. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014;6 231fs15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bianchi D.W., Chiu R.W.K. Sequencing of Circulating Cell-free DNA during Pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:464–473. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Green E.D., Rubin E.M., Olson M.V. The future of DNA sequencing. Nature. 2017;550:179–181. - PubMed
    1. van El C.G., Pieters T., Cornel M. Genetic screening and democracy: lessons from debating genetic screening criteria in the Netherlands. J. Community Genet. 2012;3:79–89. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms