Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Oct 24:10:718.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00718. eCollection 2019.

Vitamin D Binding Protein and the Biological Activity of Vitamin D

Affiliations
Review

Vitamin D Binding Protein and the Biological Activity of Vitamin D

Rene F Chun et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Vitamin D has a long-established role in bone health. In the last two decades, there has been a dramatic resurgence in research interest in vitamin D due to studies that have shown its possible benefits for non-skeletal health. Underpinning the renewed interest in vitamin D was the identification of the vital role of intracrine or localized, tissue-specific, conversion of inactive pro-hormone 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] to active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D]. This intracrine mechanism is the likely driving force behind vitamin D action resulting in positive effects on human health. To fully capture the effect of this localized, tissue-specific conversion to 1,25(OH)2D, adequate 25(OH)D would be required. As such, low serum concentrations of 25(OH)D would compromise intracrine generation of 1,25(OH)2D within target tissues. Consistent with this is the observation that all adverse human health consequences of vitamin D deficiency are associated with a low serum 25(OH)D level and not with low 1,25(OH)2D concentrations. Thus, clinical investigators have sought to define what concentration of serum 25(OH)D constitutes adequate vitamin D status. However, since 25(OH)D is transported in serum bound primarily to vitamin D binding protein (DBP) and secondarily to albumin, is the total 25(OH)D (bound plus free) or the unbound free 25(OH)D the crucial determinant of the non-classical actions of vitamin D? While DBP-bound-25(OH)D is important for renal handling of 25(OH)D and endocrine synthesis of 1,25(OH)2D, how does DBP impact extra-renal synthesis of 1,25(OH)2D and subsequent 1,25(OH)2D actions? Are their pathophysiological contexts where total 25(OH)D and free 25(OH)D would diverge in value as a marker of vitamin D status? This review aims to introduce and discuss the concept of free 25(OH)D, the molecular biology and biochemistry of vitamin D and DBP that provides the context for free 25(OH)D, and surveys in vitro, animal, and human studies taking free 25(OH)D into consideration.

Keywords: CYP27B1; DBP; VDR; bone; free vitamin D; immunology; vitamin D.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Vitamin D metabolism and action. Vitamin D metabolites (Left). 7-dehydrocholesterol (7-DHC) is photoconverted to vitamin D3 by UV exposure of skin. CYP2R1 in the liver hydroxylates vitamin D3 to 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D). Another hydroxylation to 25(OH)D3 by CYP27B1 occurs in the kidney but also in a number of extra-renal tissues produces the active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3). 1,25(OH)2D3 is the cognate ligand for the vitamin D receptor (VDR), a nuclear transcription factor, that directs 1,25(OH)2D3 regulated gene transcription. CYP24A1 is responsible for the hydroxylation that yields 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (24,25(OH)2D3) and subsequent catabolism to non-biologically active metabolites. Intracrine mechanism in immune cells (Right). Vitamin D action in immune cells is reliant upon the intracrine (local) production of active 1,25(OH)2D within the macrophage. Vitamin D status of the host as defined by serum, extracellular 25(OH)D levels impact immune response, as 25(OH)D is the substrate for CYP27B1. A complex interplay between monokine signaling, that can both be responsive to and stimulatory of 1,25(OH)2D synthesis, and regulatory signaling among innate and adaptive immune cells is shown.

References

    1. Rosen CJ, Abrams SA, Aloia JF, Brannon PM, Clinton SK, Durazo-Arvizu RA, et al. . IOM committee members respond to Endocrine Society vitamin D guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2012) 97:1146–52. 10.1210/jc.2011-2218 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosen CJ, Adams JS, Bikle DD, Black DM, Demay MB, Manson JE, et al. . The nonskeletal effects of vitamin D: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. Endocr Rev. (2012) 33:456–92. 10.1210/er.2012-1000 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christakos S, Hewison M, Gardner DG, Wagner CL, Sergeev IN, Rutten E, et al. . Vitamin D: beyond bone. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2013) 1287:45–58. 10.1111/nyas.12129 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosen CJ, Taylor CL. Common misconceptions about vitamin D–implications for clinicians. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2013) 9:434–8. 10.1038/nrendo.2013.75 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bouillon R, Marcocci C, Carmeliet G, Bikle D, White JH, Dawson-Hughes B, et al. Skeletal and extra-skeletal actions of vitamin D: current evidence and outstanding questions. Endocr Rev. (2018) 40:1109–51. 10.1210/er.2018-00126 - DOI - PMC - PubMed