Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 15:5:100037.
doi: 10.1016/j.wroa.2019.100037. eCollection 2019 Dec 1.

Model-based assessment of chromate reduction and nitrate effect in a methane-based membrane biofilm reactor

Affiliations

Model-based assessment of chromate reduction and nitrate effect in a methane-based membrane biofilm reactor

Zhen Wang et al. Water Res X. .

Abstract

Chromate contamination can pose a high risk to both the environment and public health. Previous studies have shown that CH4-based membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR) is a promising method for chromate removal. In this study, we developed a multispecies biofilm model to study chromate reduction and its interaction with nitrate reduction in a CH4-based MBfR. The model-simulated results were consistent with the experimental data reported in the literature. The model showed that the presence of nitrate in the influent promoted the growth of heterotrophs, while suppressing methanotrophs and chromate reducers. Moreover, it indicated that a biofilm thickness of 150 μm and an influent dissolved oxygen concentration of 0.5 mg O2/L could improve the reactor performance by increasing the chromate removal efficiency under the simulated conditions.

Keywords: Aerobic methane oxidation; Chromate reduction; Membrane biofilm reactor; Model analysis; Nitrate effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Image 1
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The electron flow in microbial processes considered in this model.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The concentrations and fluxes of chromate and nitrate from experiments and the model.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Biomass concentration distribution and composition of solid species in the steady-state biofilm for stage 4 (A&D, without nitrate), stage 5 (B&E, 24 mg/L·d of nitrate loading), and stage 6 (C&F, 7.3 mg/L·d of nitrate loading).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Effluent nitrate and Cr(VI) concentrations under different biofilm thicknesses (A), and biomass distribution under two sample biofilm thicknesses (B: 100 μm; C: 500 μm).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Effluent nitrate and Cr(VI) concentrations under various influent DO concentrations (A), and biomass distribution under two sample influent DO concentrations (B:0.5 mg-O2/L; C:1 mg-O2/L).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Reactor performance under various combinations of chromate and nitrate loading rates (A: chromate removal efficiency, B: nitrate removal efficiency).

Similar articles

References

    1. Alrashed W., Lee J., Park J., Rittmann B.E., Tang Y.N., Neufeld J.D., Lee H.S. Hypoxic methane oxidation coupled to denitrification in a membrane biofilm. Chem. Eng. J. 2018;348:745–753. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.202. - DOI
    1. Ahmed T., Semmens M.J. The use of independently sealed microporous hollow fiber membranes for oxygenation of water: model development. J. Membr. Sci. 1992;69:11–20. doi: 10.1016/0376-7388(92)80163-E. - DOI
    1. Camargo F.A., Bento F.M., Okeke B.C., Frankenberger W.T. Chromate reduction by chromium-resistant bacteria isolated from soils contaminated with dichromate. J. Environ. Qual. 2003;32:1228. doi: 10.2134/jeq2003.1228. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen J., Strous M. Denitrification and aerobic respiration, hybrid electron transport chains and co-evolution. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2013;1827:136–144. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.10.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen X.M., Ni B.J. Model-based evaluation on simultaneous nitrate and arsenite removal in a membrane biofilm reactor. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2016;152:488–496. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2016.06.049. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources