Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar:144:13-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Nov 8.

Prognostic importance of radiologic extranodal extension in HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma and its potential role in refining TNM-8 cN-classification

Affiliations

Prognostic importance of radiologic extranodal extension in HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma and its potential role in refining TNM-8 cN-classification

Shao Hui Huang et al. Radiother Oncol. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines outcome heterogeneity and potential to refine the TNM-8 cN-classification using radiologic extranodal extension (rENE) in a contemporary HPV-positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) cohort.

Methods: All HPV+ OPC treated with definitive IMRT from 2010-2015 were included. Pre-treatment CT/MR of cN+ cases were reviewed by a head-neck radiologist for rENE. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between rENE-positive (rENE+) vs rENE-negative (rENE-). Multivariable analysis (MVA) for OS confirmed the prognostic value of rENE. Refined cN-classifications for new TNM staging proposals were evaluated against TNM-8 using established criteria.

Results: A total of 517 cN+ (rENE+: 97; rENE-: 420) and 41 cN0 cases were identified. The rENE+ proportion increased with rising N-category (N1/N2/N3: 11%/19%/84%, p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 5.1 years. Compared to rENE-, rENE+ patients had a lower 5-year OS (56% vs 85%) and DFS (46% vs 83%) overall, and in N1 (OS: 57% vs 89%; DFS: 51% vs 87%) and N2 subsets (OS: 45% and 76%; DFS: 33% vs 74%) (all p < 0.001). MVA confirmed the prognostic value of rENE for OS (HR = 3.86, p < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 3.89, p < 0.001). We proposed two new cN-classifications: Schema1 reclassified any N_rENE+ as New_N3; Schema2 reclassified N1_rENE+ as New_N2 and N2_rENE+ as New_N3. Stage incorporating either Schema1 (ranked 1st) or Schema2 (ranked 2nd) cN-categories outperformed TNM-8.

Conclusion: This study confirms that rENE is prognostically important and facilitates understanding of known outcome heterogeneity within TNM-8 in HPV+ OPC patients. rENE is a promising parameter to refine the TNM-8 cN-classifications.

Keywords: HPV; Oropharyngeal carcinoma; Outcome; Prognosis; Staging; cN-classification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources