Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;43(6):1493-1507.
doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01180-7. Epub 2019 Nov 11.

Hinge/floating craniotomy as an alternative technique for cerebral decompression: a scoping review

Affiliations

Hinge/floating craniotomy as an alternative technique for cerebral decompression: a scoping review

Hugo Layard Horsfall et al. Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Hinge craniotomy (HC) is a technique that allows for a degree of decompression whilst retaining the bone flap in situ, in a 'floating' or 'hinged' fashion. This provides expansion potential for ensuing cerebral oedema whilst obviating the need for cranioplasty in the future. The exact indications, technique and outcomes of this procedure have yet to be determined, but it is likely that HC provides an alternative technique to decompressive craniectomy (DC) in certain contexts. The primary objective was to collate and describe the current evidence base for HC, including perioperative parameters, functional outcomes and complications. The secondary objective was to identify current nomenclature, operative technique and operative decision-making. A scoping review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR Checklist. Fifteen studies totalling 283 patients (mean age 45.1 and M:F 199:46) were included. There were 12 different terms for HC. The survival rate of the cohort was 74.6% (n = 211). Nine patients (3.2%) required subsequent formal DC. Six studies compared HC to DC following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke, finding at least equivalent control of intracranial pressure (ICP). These studies also reported reduced rates of complications, including infection, in HC compared to DC. We have described the current evidence base of HC. There is no evidence of substantially worse outcomes compared to DC, although no randomised trials were identified. Eventually, a randomised trial will be useful to determine if HC should be offered as first-line treatment when indicated.

Keywords: Decompressive craniectomy; Neurosurgery; Stroke; Traumatic brain injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Franco Servadei has received personal fees from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, grants and personal fees from Integra LifeSciences and grants and personal fees from Finceramica SpA. The rest of the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA 2009 flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Outstanding questions for HC

References

    1. Dewan, M. C. et al. (2018) Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 1–18. 10.3171/2017.10.jns17352 - PubMed
    1. Kolias AG, et al. The current status of decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury. Curr Trauma Rep. 2018;4:326–332. doi: 10.1007/s40719-018-0147-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cooper JD, et al. Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. New Engl J Med. 2011;364:1493–1502. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102077. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hutchinson PJ, et al. Trial of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic intracranial hypertension. New Engl J Med. 2016;375:1119–1130. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1605215. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vahedi K, et al. Sequential-design, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of early decompressive craniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (DECIMAL Trial) Stroke. 2007;38:2506–2517. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.485235. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources