Postdiagnosis sedentary behavior and health outcomes in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 31714596
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32578
Postdiagnosis sedentary behavior and health outcomes in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: High levels of sedentary behavior may negatively affect health outcomes in cancer survivors. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to clarify whether postdiagnosis sedentary behavior is related to survival, patient-reported outcomes, and anthropometric outcomes in cancer survivors.
Methods: The Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL (The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and SPORTDiscus databases were searched from study inception to June 2019. Studies of adults who had been diagnosed with cancer that examined the association between sedentary behavior and mortality, patient-reported outcomes (eg, fatigue, depression), or anthropometric outcomes (eg, body mass index, waist circumference) were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analyses were performed to estimate hazard ratios for the highest compared with the lowest levels of sedentary behavior for all-cause and colorectal cancer-specific mortality outcomes. The ROBINS-E (Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies-of Exposures tool) and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system were used to assess the risk of bias and the strength of evidence, respectively.
Results: Thirty-three eligible publications from a total of 3569 identified articles were included in the review. A higher level of postdiagnosis sedentary behavior was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06-1.41; heterogeneity [I2 statistic], 33.8%) as well as colorectal cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.14-2.06; I2 , 0%). No clear or consistent associations between sedentary behavior and patient-reported or anthropometric outcomes were identified. The risk of bias in individual studies ranged from moderate to serious, and the strength of evidence ranged from very low to low.
Conclusions: Although avoiding high levels of sedentary behavior after a cancer diagnosis may improve survival, further research is required to help clarify whether the association is causal.
Keywords: mortality; neoplasms; screen time; sedentary behavior; sitting; survivors; survivorship.
© 2019 American Cancer Society.
Similar articles
-
[Correlation between sedentary behavior and illness varies with the method of measurement].Lakartidningen. 2016 Apr 22;113:DU33. Lakartidningen. 2016. PMID: 27115777 Review. Swedish.
-
Association between sedentary behavior, depressive symptoms, and the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality among U.S. cancer survivors.BMC Cancer. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13578-2. BMC Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40155883 Free PMC article.
-
Sedentary behavior after breast cancer: motivational, demographic, disease, and health status correlates of sitting time in breast cancer survivors.Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Jun;30(6):569-580. doi: 10.1007/s10552-019-01153-7. Epub 2019 Mar 27. Cancer Causes Control. 2019. PMID: 30919252 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of mHealth for self-management in improving pain, psychological distress, fatigue, and sleep in cancer survivors: a systematic review.J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Feb;13(1):97-107. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0730-8. Epub 2019 Jan 11. J Cancer Surviv. 2019. PMID: 30635865
-
Reallocating Time to Sleep, Sedentary Time, or Physical Activity: Associations with Waist Circumference and Body Mass Index in Breast Cancer Survivors.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Feb;26(2):254-260. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0545. Epub 2016 Oct 25. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017. PMID: 27780817 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The Alberta moving beyond breast cancer (AMBER) cohort study: baseline description of the full cohort.Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Mar;33(3):441-453. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01539-6. Epub 2022 Jan 22. Cancer Causes Control. 2022. PMID: 35064432 Free PMC article.
-
Harnessing digital health to objectively assess cancer-related fatigue: The impact of fatigue on mobility performance.PLoS One. 2021 Feb 26;16(2):e0246101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246101. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33636720 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of a Health Coach Intervention to Reduce Sitting Time and Improve Physical Functioning Among Breast Cancer Survivors: Pilot Intervention Study.JMIR Cancer. 2023 Dec 19;9:e49934. doi: 10.2196/49934. JMIR Cancer. 2023. PMID: 38113082 Free PMC article.
-
A randomized controlled trial of Promoting Physical Activity in Regional and Remote Cancer Survivors (PPARCS).J Sport Health Sci. 2024 Jan;13(1):81-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2023.01.003. Epub 2023 Feb 3. J Sport Health Sci. 2024. PMID: 36736725 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The 24-Hour Movement Paradigm: An integrated approach to the measurement and promotion of daily activity in cancer clinical trials.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Jan 31;32:101081. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101081. eCollection 2023 Apr. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023. PMID: 36875555 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jensen RE, Potosky AL, Moinpour CM, et al. United States population-based estimates of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system symptom and functional status reference values for individuals with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:1913-1920.
-
- Sedentary Behaviour Research Network. Letter to the editor: standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviours.” Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37:540-542.
-
- Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, et al. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN)-Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2017;14:75.
-
- Lynch BM, Dunstan DW, Vallance JK, Owen N. Don't take cancer sitting down: a new survivorship research agenda. Cancer. 2013;119:1928-1935.
-
- Dunstan DW, Barr EL, Healy GN, et al. Television viewing time and mortality: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Circulation. 2010;121:384-391.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical