Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 11;36(5):498-511.e17.
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.10.002.

A Potent and Selective Small-Molecule Degrader of STAT3 Achieves Complete Tumor Regression In Vivo

Affiliations

A Potent and Selective Small-Molecule Degrader of STAT3 Achieves Complete Tumor Regression In Vivo

Longchuan Bai et al. Cancer Cell. .

Abstract

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is an attractive cancer therapeutic target. Here we report the discovery of SD-36, a small-molecule degrader of STAT3. SD-36 potently induces the degradation of STAT3 protein in vitro and in vivo and demonstrates high selectivity over other STAT members. Induced degradation of STAT3 results in a strong suppression of its transcription network in leukemia and lymphoma cells. SD-36 inhibits the growth of a subset of acute myeloid leukemia and anaplastic large-cell lymphoma cell lines by inducing cell-cycle arrest and/or apoptosis. SD-36 achieves complete and long-lasting tumor regression in multiple xenograft mouse models at well-tolerated dose schedules. Degradation of STAT3 protein, therefore, is a promising cancer therapeutic strategy.

Keywords: PROTAC; SH2 domain; STAT3; c-Myc; degrader; leukemia; lymphoma; selectivity; transcriptional factor; undruggable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Structure-guided Design of STAT3 SH2 Domain Inhibitors and PROTAC Degraders
(A) Design of STAT3 SH2 domain inhibitors. Ki values are the means of three independent experiments. (B) Chemical structures of PROTAC STAT3 degrader SD-36 and its inactive control SD-36Me. (C) Co-crystal structure of SD-36 (orange) with STAT3 (grey). SI-109 binds to STAT3 in nearly identical binding modes as SD-36. Key residues in STAT3 interacting with SD-36 are labeled and hydrogen bonds are depicted as red dashed lines. A mediating water molecule is shown as a sphere. The hydrophobic patch formed by I659, M660 and L666 is shown as surface representation. See also Figure S1.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. SD-36-mediated Cellular STAT3 Protein Degradation
(A) Cells were treated with SD-336, 10 μM of SI-109 or SD-36Me for 3 hr (MOLM-16) or 24 hr (SU-DHL-1) for immunoblotting. (B) MOLM-16 cells were treated with 0.25 μM of SD-36 for immunoblotting. (C) MOLM-16 cells stably transduced with vector control or CRBN shRNAs were treated with 1 μM of SD-36 for 3 hr for immunoblotting. (D) MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with the indicated STAT3-expressing vectors were treated with 1 μM of SD-36 for 16 hr for immunoblotting. (E) Human PBMCs were treated with SD-36 or 10 μM of SD-36Me for 24 hr for immunoblotting. (F) Cells were treated with 10 μM of SD-36 for 2.5 hr for multiplexed quantitative proteomics analysis. p value: Student’s t-test. (G) Cells were treated with 1 μM of the indicated compounds for 24 hr for immunoblotting. (H) Parental DLD-1 (WT) and DLD-1/STAT3Y705F/Y705F (Y705F) cells were pre-incubated with or without 10 ng/ml of IL-6 for 15 min, then 1 μM of SD-36 for 24 hr for immunoblotting. See also Figure S2.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Effect of SD-36 on the Transcriptional Activity of STAT3
(A) MOLM-16 cells were treated for 5 hr. Whole cell lysis was subjected to native electrophoresis followed by immunoblotting. (B) Cells were treated with 1 μM of SD-36 or 10 μM of SI-109 for 8 hr. Nuclear extracts were prepared for STAT3 DNA binding activity assay (mean ± SEM; n=3). (C) MOLM-16 cells expressing STAT3-driven firefly luciferase gene were treated for 24 hr for luciferase reporter assay. Representative concentration-response curves are shown. (D) MOLM-16 cells were treated with 1 μM of SD-36 for 8 hr for RNA-seq analysis. The horizontal dashed line marks the statistical significance (FDR ≤ 0.05) and the vertical lines mark the fold change (FC) (|Log2FC| ≥1). Black arrows indicate representative genes validated by qRT-PCR. The numbers indicate genes that meet these criteria: blue, down-regulated; red, up-regulated. FDR: false discovery rate. (E) GSEA showed the STAT3 targets gene set (GSE21670) is down-regulated by SD-36 in MOLM-16 cells. NES: normalized enrichment score. (F) MOLM-16 cells were treated with 1 μM of SD-36 or SD-36Me for 8 hr for qRT-PCR. Data are the means of two independent experiments. See also Figure S3.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Growth-inhibitory Activity of SD-36 in AML and ALCL Cell Lines
(A) The expression of the indicated proteins was profiled by immunoblotting. SD-36 sensitive cell lines (IC50 ≤ 2 μM) are labelled in green. (B) The growth-inhibitory activities of SD-36 and SI-109 in leukemia and lymphoma cell lines were determined by a 4-day CellTiter Glo assay. IC50 values are the means of three independent experiments. DLBCL: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; HL: Hodgkin’s lymphoma; nHL: non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. SD-36 sensitive cell lines (IC50 ≤ 2 μM) are labelled in green. (C) Representative concentration-response curves of CellTiter Glo assay. Len: lenalidomide; SI+Len: SI-109 plus lenalidomide at 1:1 molar ratio. (D) Cells were treated with SD-36 (0.5 μM), SI-109 (1 μM), lenalidomide (Len, 1 μM) and SI-109 plus Len (1:1 molar ratio at 1 μM) for 24 hr for immunoblotting. (E) Cells were treated with 1 μM of SD-36 or SD-36Me for 48 hr for cell cycle analysis (mean ± SEM; n=3). (F) Cells treated for 48 hr for apoptosis analysis by Annexin V staining (mean ± SEM; n=3). p value: Student’s t test. (G) Cells were treated with 1 μM of SD-36Me or SD-36 for 24 hr for qRT-PCR. Data are means of two independent experiments. See also Figure S4 and Table S1.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Anti-tumor Activity of SD-36 in Xenograft Tumor Models
(A) NOD/SCID mice bearing MOLM-16 tumors were treated i.v. as indicated. Tumor lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting. (B) MOLM-16 tumors were analyzed by immunoblotting. (C) NOD/SCID mice bearing MOLM-16 tumors were treated i.v. with 100 mg/kg of SD-36Me or SI-109. Tumor lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting. (D) NOD/SCID mice bearing MOLM-16 tumors were treated with 25 mg/kg of SD-36 i.v. for 6 hr. Tumor lysates were analyzed by multiplexed proteomics analysis. p value: Student’s t test. (E) SCID mice bearing MOLM-16 tumors were treated with vehicle control (veh) or 25 mg/kg of SD-36 i.v.. Total RNAs were isolated from tumor lysates for qRT-PCR. (F) Tumor-bearing SCID mice were treated at the indicated dosing schedules, and tumor volumes were measured every 2–3 days (mean ± SEM; n=6–8). qD: daily; qW: weekly. See also Figure S5.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. Toxicity of SD-36 in Immunocompetent Mice
(A) Female CD-1 mice were treated with SD-36 at 100 mg/kg i.v. Mouse tissues were analyzed by immunoblotting. (B) CD-1 mice were treated i.v. for 3 weeks. Mouse body weight was measured every 2–3 days (mean ± SEM; n=4–8). qD: daily. See also Tables S2–S5 and Figure S6.

Comment in

References

    1. Arora L, Kumar AP, Arfuso F, Chng WJ, and Sethi G (2018). The Role of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 (STAT3) and Its Targeted Inhibition in Hematological Malignancies. Cancers (Basel) 10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bai L, Zhou B, Yang CY, Ji J, McEachern D, Przybranowski S, Jiang H, Hu J, Xu F, Zhao Y, et al. (2017). Targeted Degradation of BET Proteins in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 77, 2476–2487. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banerjee K, and Resat H (2016). Constitutive activation of STAT3 in breast cancer cells: A review. Int J Cancer 138, 2570–2578. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bar-Natan M, Nelson EA, Xiang M, and Frank DA (2012). STAT signaling in the pathogenesis and treatment of myeloid malignancies. JAKSTAT 1, 55–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Becker S, Groner B, and Muller CW (1998). Three-dimensional structure of the Stat3beta homodimer bound to DNA. Nature 394, 145–151. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms