Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Feb;77(2):201-208.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Nov 10.

Local Failure and Survival After Definitive Radiotherapy for Aggressive Prostate Cancer: An Individual Patient-level Meta-analysis of Six Randomized Trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Local Failure and Survival After Definitive Radiotherapy for Aggressive Prostate Cancer: An Individual Patient-level Meta-analysis of Six Randomized Trials

Amar U Kishan et al. Eur Urol. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The importance of local failure (LF) after treatment of high-grade prostate cancer (PCa) with definitive radiotherapy (RT) remains unknown.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical implications of LF after definitive RT.

Design, setting, and participants: Individual patient data meta-analysis of 992 patients (593 Gleason grade group [GG] 4 and 399 GG 5) enrolled in six randomized clinical trials.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were developed to evaluate the relationship between overall survival (OS), PCa-specific survival (PCSS), and distant metastasis (DM)-free survival (DMFS) and LF as a time-dependent covariate. Markov proportional hazard models were developed to evaluate the impact of specific transitions between disease states on these endpoints.

Results and limitations: Median follow-up was 6.4 yr overall and 7.2 yr for surviving patients. LF was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.70 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.37-2.10]), PCSS (3.10 [95% CI 2.33-4.12]), and DMFS (HR 1.92 [95% CI 1.54-2.39]), p < 0.001 for all). Patients who had not transitioned to the LF state had a significantly lower hazard of transitioning to a PCa-specific death state than those who transitioned to the LF state (HR 0.13 [95% CI 0.04-0.41], p < 0.001). Additionally, patients who transitioned to the LF state had a greater hazard of DM or death (HR 2.46 [95% CI 1.22-4.93], p = 0.01) than those who did not.

Conclusions: LF is an independent prognosticator of OS, PCSS, and DMFS in high-grade localized PCa and a subset of DM events that are anteceded by LF events. LF events warrant consideration for intervention, potentially suggesting a rationale for upfront treatment intensification. However, whether these findings apply to all men or just those without significant comorbidity remains to be determined.

Patient summary: Men who experience a local recurrence of high-grade prostate cancer after receiving upfront radiation therapy are at significantly increased risks of developing metastases and dying of prostate cancer.

Keywords: High grade; Local failure; Radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial disclosures: Amar U. Kishan certifies that all conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript (eg, employment/affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, or patents filed, received, or pending), are the following: None.

Figures

Fig. 1 –
Fig. 1 –
Schematic depiction of the (A) four-state and (B) three-state models developed to evaluate various disease states experienced and traversed by patients with high-grade localized prostate cancer. The four-state model was designed to evaluate the outcomes PCSS and OS; patients who did not experience a PCa-specific mortality event were coded as “censored” for PCSS. OS = overall survival; PCa = prostate cancer; PCSS = PCa-specific survival.
Fig. 2 –
Fig. 2 –
Hazard rate of distant metastasis development in 2-yr intervals in patients with local control (LC, blue) and local failure (LF, red). Here, these are treated as time-independent variables, meaning that all patients with LF at any point (before or after distant metastasis development) are included in the LF group, whereas patients in the LC group never had an LF event. ADT = androgen deprivation therapy; DM = distant metastasis; LTADT = long-term ADT; RT = radiotherapy; STADT = short-term ADT.

Comment in

References

    1. Fossa SD, Wiklund F, Klepp O, et al. Ten- and 15-yr prostate cancer-specific mortality in patients with nonmetastatic locally advanced or aggressive intermediate prostate cancer, randomized to lifelong endocrine treatment alone or combined with radiotherapy: final results of the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-7. Eur Urol 2016;70:684–91. - PubMed
    1. Mason MD, Parulekar WR, Sydes MR, et al. Final report of the intergroup randomized study of combined androgen-deprivation therapy plus radiotherapy versus androgen-deprivation therapy alone in locally advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:2143–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grossman HB, Batata M, Hilaris B, Whitmore WF Jr. 125I implantation for carcinoma of prostate. Further follow-up of first 100 cases. Urology 1982;20:591–8. - PubMed
    1. Coen JJ, Zietman AL, Thakral H, Shipley WU. Radical radiation for localized prostate cancer: local persistence of disease results in a late wave of metastases. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:3199–205. - PubMed
    1. Freiha FS, Bagshaw MA. Carcinoma of the prostate: results of post-irradiation biopsy. Prostate 1984;5:19–25. - PubMed

Publication types