Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 12;9(1):16537.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52987-9.

Precision and Normative Values of a New Computerized Chart for Contrast Sensitivity Testing

Affiliations

Precision and Normative Values of a New Computerized Chart for Contrast Sensitivity Testing

Giacomo Savini et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The purpose was to define a normative database for a grating test for contrast sensitivity, based on a chart monitor with high-definition liquid crystal display, and validate its measurements by assessing their repeatability and determining responsiveness to cataract surgery. Three samples were analyzed: (1) healthy volunteers to assess the repeatability of measurements, (2) healthy subjects to develop the normative database, (3) patients undergoing cataract surgery. All subjects were tested with the grating contrast sensitivity test (Vision Chart, CSO) at 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 18 cycles per degree. The instrument software progressively reduces the contrast of the gratings according to the Quick Estimate by Sequential Testing (QUEST) procedure. In the subjects of the first sample, three consecutive measurements were taken and repeatability was assessed on the basis of the intra-session test-retest variability and the coefficient of variation. The test offered high repeatability, with test-retest variability ranging between 0.05 and 0.23 Log CS and the coefficient of variation between 0.61 and 4.21%. Normative data did not show a normal distribution. The highest median values were observed at 1.5, 3 and 6 cycles per degree frequencies. At these frequencies a ceiling effect was evident. In cataract patients, postoperative values showed an improvement at all spatial frequencies. In conclusion, the new contrast sensitivity test provides repeatable measurements that can be used for clinical purposes. In patients with healthy eyes and good vision, attention has to be paid to the ceiling effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of CS measurements in the healthy sample.

References

    1. Reinstein DZ, et al. Long-term visual and refractive outcomes after LASIK for high myopia and astigmatism from −8.00 to −14.25. J Refract Surg. 2016;32:290–297. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160310-01. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Toda I, Ide T, Fukumoto T, Tsubota K. Visual outcomes after LASIK using topography-guided vs wavefront-guided customized ablation systems. J Refract Surg. 2016;32:727–732. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160718-02. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steinwender G, et al. Depth of focus after implantation of spherical or aspheric intraocular lenses in hyperopic and emmetropic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:1413–1419. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ekici F, et al. Relationships between measures of the ability to perform vision-related activities, vision-related quality of life, and clinical findings in patients with glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133:1377–1385. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.3426. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hawkins AS, Szlyk JP, Ardickas Z, Alexander KR, Wilensky JT. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2003;12:134–138. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200304000-00008. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types