Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 6:7:50.
doi: 10.1186/s40560-019-0402-4. eCollection 2019.

A comprehensive protocol for ventilator weaning and extubation: a prospective observational study

Affiliations

A comprehensive protocol for ventilator weaning and extubation: a prospective observational study

Kenichi Nitta et al. J Intensive Care. .

Abstract

Background: Ventilator weaning protocols have been shown to reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), intensive care unit length of stay, and resource use. However, weaning protocols have not significantly affected mortality or reintubation rates. The extubation process is a critical component of respiratory care in patients who receive MV. Post-extubation respiratory failure (PERF) is a common event associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that a comprehensive protocol for ventilator weaning and extubation would be effective for preventing PERF and reintubation and reducing mortality in critically ill patients.

Methods: A ventilator weaning and extubation protocol was developed. The protocol consisted of checklists across four evaluations: spontaneous breathing trial, extubation, prophylactic non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV), and evaluation after extubation. Observational data were collected after implementing the protocol in patients admitted to the Advanced Emergency and Critical Care Center of Shinshu University Hospital. Not only outcomes of patients but also influences of each component of the protocol on the clinical decision-making process were investigated. Further, a comparison between PERF and non-PERF patients was performed.

Results: A total of 464 consecutive patients received MV for more than 48 h, and 248 (77 women; mean age, 65 ± 17 years) were deemed eligible. The overall PERF and reintubation rates were 9.7% and 5.2%, respectively. Overall, 54.1% of patients with PERF received reintubation. Hospital stay and mortality were not significantly different between PERF and non-PERF patients (p = 0.16 and 0.057, respectively). As a result, the 28-day and hospital mortality were 1.2% and 6.9%, respectively.

Conclusions: We found that the rates of PERF, reintubation, and hospital mortality were lower than those in previous reports even with nearly the same degree of severity at extubation. The comprehensive protocol for ventilator weaning and extubation may prevent PERF and reintubation and reduce mortality in critically ill patients.

Keywords: Comprehensive protocol for ventilator weaning and extubation; Hospital mortality; Post-extubation respiratory failure; Reintubation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Protocol flow chart. SBT, spontaneous breathing trial; PERF, post-extubation respiratory failure; NPPV, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Details of a comprehensive protocol for ventilator weaning and extubation. SBT, spontaneous breathing trial; PSV, pressure support ventilation; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; RR, respiratory rate; RSBI, rapid shallow breathing index; SaO2, oxygen saturation; HR, heart rate; PERF, post-extubation respiratory failure; APACHE II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; NPPV, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation; SpO2, arterial oxygen saturation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Flow chart of the study patients. MV, mechanical ventilation; PERF, post-extubation respiratory failure; NPPV, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation

Comment in

  • Strategies for Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation.
    Reaume M, Noor Ul Husnain SM, Kapadia D, Tatem G. Reaume M, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 May 1;203(9):1183-1185. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202006-2312RR. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021. PMID: 33631088 No abstract available.

References

    1. Khamiees M, Raju P, DeGirolamo A, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Manthous CA. Predictors of extubation outcome in patients who have successfully completed a spontaneous breathing trial. Chest. 2001;120:1262–1270. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.4.1262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krishnan JA, Moore D, Robeson C, Rand CS, Fessler HE. A prospective, controlled trial of a protocol-based strategy to discontinue mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169:673–678. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200306-761OC. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Navalesi P, Frigerio P, Moretti MP, Sommariva M, Vesconi S, Baiardi P, Levati A. Rate of reintubation in mechanically ventilated neurosurgical and neurologic patients: evaluation of a systematic approach to weaning and extubation. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:2986–2992. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31818b35f2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Namen AM, Ely EW, Tatter SB, Case LD, Lucia MA, Smith A, et al. Predictors of successful extubation in neurosurgical patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:658–664. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.3.2003060. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tobin MJ, Laghi F. Extubation. In: Tobin MJ, editor. Principles and practice of mechanical ventilation. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004. pp. 1221–1237.