Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 19;11(9):e5703.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.5703.

Patient Prioritization for Proton Beam Therapy in a Cost-neutral Payer Environment: Use of the Clinical Benefit Score for Resource Allocation

Affiliations

Patient Prioritization for Proton Beam Therapy in a Cost-neutral Payer Environment: Use of the Clinical Benefit Score for Resource Allocation

Ankur M Sharma et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Objectives There has been a rapid increase in the number of one- and two-room proton beam therapy (PBT) centers, which may be limited in the number of patients they can treat. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of the 'clinical benefit score' (CBS), utilized as a method for treatment prioritization for PBT operating in a 'cost-neutral' proton-photon payer environment. Materials & methods This study includes patients considered for PBT at a center that initially had only one or two treatment rooms available for clinical use. Patients were prospectively scored using the CBS, and higher scores were prioritized. The outcome was receipt of PBT and the independent variable was CBS. Crude and adjusted analyses were performed using logistic regression. Results There were 2163 patients evaluated. A total of 205 patients (9.5%) were deemed candidates for PBT, which was received by 122 (5.6%) patients. In patients considered for PBT, the mean CBS was 18.7. Patients who were <21 years old, female, non-Caucasian, receiving re-irradiation, and those with Medicare had a higher CBS. Multivariate analysis adjusting for insurance status revealed both CBS and insurance to be significant predictors for receiving PBT. A unit increase in CBS was associated with 1.04 times increased odds of receiving PBT (OR=1.04, 95%CI: 1.01-1.07, p=0.0145) and having Medicare was associated with 3.13 times increased odds of receiving PBT (OR=3.13, 95%CI: 1.57-6.26, p=0.0012). Subgroup analysis, which only included patients enrolled prior to opening the second gantry, showed 1.05 times increased odds of receiving PBT per unit increase in CBS (OR=1.05, 95%CI: 1.00-1.10, p=0.03) and 2.87 times increased odds of receiving PBT in patients with Medicare (OR=2.87, 95%CI: 1.04-7.92, p=0.04). Conclusion The CBS utilized was significantly associated with the receipt of PBT in a cost-neutral payer setting. Physicians may consider the use of CBS as a resource allocation tool.

Keywords: clinical score; proton therapy; radiation; radiotherapy; resource allocation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group. Particle therapy facilities in clinical operation. [Apr;2019 ];https://www.ptcog.ch/index.php/facilities-in-operation 2019
    1. Proton beam therapy in pediatric oncology. Baliga S, Yock TI. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019;31:28–34. - PubMed
    1. Proton beam therapy for cancer in the era of precision medicine. Hu M, Jiang L, Cui X, Zhang J, Jinming Yu J. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11:1–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Proton therapy - a systemic review of clinical effectiveness. Olsen DR, Bruland OS, Frykholm G, Norderhaugd IN. Radiother Oncol. 2007;83:123–132. - PubMed
    1. Charged particles in radiotherapy: a 5-year update of a systemic review. De Ruysscher D, Mark Lodge M, Jones B, Bradad M, Munroe A, Jefferson T, Pijls-Johannesmaa M. Radiother Oncol. 2012;103:5–7. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources