Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 13;14(11):e0224262.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224262. eCollection 2019.

Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities

Affiliations

Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities

Carolina Llorente et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The increasing perception that public communication in science and technology is an important tool to create a knowledge society is encouraging numerous public engagement activities. However, too little is known about scientists' opinions of and attitudes towards the public with whom they interact during these activities, especially in southern European countries such as Spain. If we want to establish an effective dialogue between science and society, we need to be aware of the opinions and perceptions that both parties have of each other. In this study, we address this issue by focusing on 1022 responses to a survey conducted among scientists in Spain to discover their views of the public, and we then compare these responses with data from other national surveys on the public's understanding of science. The results show that approximately 75% of Spanish scientists think that the general public has a serious lack of knowledge and understanding of scientific reasoning, although scientists do recognize that science interests the public (73%). Scientists believe that the public values the scientific profession to a lesser extent than suggested by public surveys: on a scale of 1-5, survey respondents rate their valuation of the scientific profession at 4.22, whereas scientists rate the public's valuation of the profession at 3.12, on average. Significant differences were detected between scientists' perceptions of how citizens are informed about science and what citizens report in surveys. The challenge for the future is to narrow this gap in order to help scientists gain a better understanding of the public and their interests and to make public engagement activities more effective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Scientists’ views of public valuing of professions.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Scientists’ views of how the public is informed about science and technology.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Training in scientific communication.
Fig 4
Fig 4. The perceived level of interest in science and technology by society in general (FECYT and Eurobarometer data) and scientists (our data).
Fig 5
Fig 5. Prioritization of public spending in science and technology by society in general (FECYT data) and scientists (our data).
Fig 6
Fig 6. The perceived level of scientific culture in Spain compared to other European countries by society in general (FECYT data) and scientists (our data).
Fig 7
Fig 7. The perceived level of public recognition of professions by society in general (FECYT 2016 data) and by scientists (our data).
Fig 8
Fig 8. The perceived main sources of science and technology information by society (FECYT 2016 data) and by scientists (our data).

References

    1. European Comission. Horizon 2020 “science with and for society” providing advice on potential priorities for research and innovation in the work programme 2016–2017 consultation paper. 2014
    1. Hockfield S. Our science, our society. Science (80-). 2018;359(6375):499 10.1126/science.aat0957 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Felt U. Taking European knowledge society seriously European Comission; Belgium; 2007
    1. Van der Hoven J, Jacob K, Nielsen L, Roure F, Rudze L, Stilgoe J. Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation. Brussels; 2013
    1. Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy. 2013;42(9):1568–80.

Publication types