Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1914078.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14078.

Association of Punitive and Reporting State Policies Related to Substance Use in Pregnancy With Rates of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome

Affiliations

Association of Punitive and Reporting State Policies Related to Substance Use in Pregnancy With Rates of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome

Laura J Faherty et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Despite the rapidly changing policy environment regarding substance use during pregnancy, information is lacking on the association of state policies with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS).

Objective: To determine if punitive or reporting state policies related to substance use during pregnancy are associated with NAS rates.

Design, setting, and participants: This repeated cross-sectional study used retrospective, difference-in-difference analysis of live births in the State Inpatient Databases from 8 US states in varying years between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2014. States without punitive or reporting policies were compared with states with policies before and after policy enactment using logistic regression models adjusted for individual and county-level factors and state and year fixed effects. Analyses were conducted from April 10, 2019, to July 30, 2019.

Exposures: Time since enactment of state policies related to substance use in pregnancy, county-level rurality and unemployment, and presence of specialized treatment programs for pregnant and postpartum women in a county.

Main outcome and measures: Rates of NAS.

Results: Among 4 567 963 live births, 23 377 neonates (0.5%) received a diagnosis of NAS. Among neonates with NAS, 3394 (14.5%) lived in counties without any treatment programs specifically for pregnant and postpartum women, 20 323 (86.9%) lived in metropolitan counties, and 8135 (34.8%) lived in counties in the highest unemployment quartile. In adjusted analyses among neonates in states with punitive policies, odds of NAS were significantly greater during the first full calendar year after enactment (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.46; P = .007) and more than 1 full year after enactment (adjusted odds ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.17-1.51; P < .001). After regression adjustment, the annual NAS rate was 46 (95% CI, 43-48) neonates with NAS per 10 000 live births in states without punitive policies; 57 (95% CI, 48-65) neonates with NAS per 10 000 live births in states with punitive policies during the first full year after enactment; and 60 (95% CI, 56-65) neonates with NAS per 10 000 live births in states with punitive policies in effect for more than 1 full year. There was no association between reporting policies and odds of NAS.

Conclusions and relevance: In this repeated cross-sectional analysis of 8 states, states with punitive policies were associated with greater odds of NAS immediately and in the longer term, but there was no association between NAS and states with reporting policies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Annual Rates of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) per 10 000 Live Births Stratified by State Punitive Policies
The adjusted rate of NAS per 10 000 live births for neonates was estimated from the regression model conditional on residing in states without punitive policies, during the first full calendar year after punitive policies went into effect, and with punitive policies in effect for more than 1 full calendar year, while keeping all other covariates at their original values. Error bars indicate 95% CI.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Haight SCKJ, Ko JY, Tong VT, Bohm MK, Callaghan WM. Opioid use disorder documented at delivery hospitalization: United States, 1999-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(31):-. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6731a1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patrick SW, Schumacher RE, Benneyworth BD, Krans EE, McAllister JM, Davis MM. Neonatal abstinence syndrome and associated health care expenditures: United States, 2000-2009. JAMA. 2012;307(18):1934-1940. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.3951 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winkelman TNA, Villapiano N, Kozhimannil KB, Davis MM, Patrick SW. Incidence and costs of neonatal abstinence syndrome among infants with Medicaid: 2004-2014. Pediatrics. 2018;141(4):e20173520. doi:10.1542/peds.2017-3520 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tolia VN, Patrick SW, Bennett MM, et al. . Increasing incidence of the neonatal abstinence syndrome in US neonatal ICUs. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(22):2118-2126. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1500439 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patrick SW, Kaplan HC, Passarella M, Davis MM, Lorch SA. Variation in treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome in US children’s hospitals, 2004-2011. J Perinatol. 2014;34(11):867-872. doi:10.1038/jp.2014.114 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types