Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;9(1):56-66.
doi: 10.1002/pchj.318. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

Impact of academic psychological capital on academic achievement among university undergraduates: Roles of flow and self-handicapping behavior

Affiliations

Impact of academic psychological capital on academic achievement among university undergraduates: Roles of flow and self-handicapping behavior

Adnan Adil et al. Psych J. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

The present research explored the mediating roles of flow and self-handicapping behaviors in the relationship between academic psychological capital (PsyCap) and academic achievement in a purposive sample of university undergraduates (N = 300). Components of academic PsyCap were measured with the Perceived Self-efficacy subscale of the Student Approaches to Learning Scale, the Life Orientation Test - Academics, the Academic Hope Scale, and the Academic Resilience Scale. Flow and self-handicapping behaviors were measured with the Flow Short Scale and the Self-handicapping Scale Revised, respectively. Students' cumulative grade point averages (CGPAs) in the previous semester were taken as an index of their academic achievement. The measurement model of the study revealed a good fit to the data and the structural model indicated the positive direct effects of academic PsyCap and flow and the negative effect of self-handicapping behaviors on academic achievement. Both flow and self-handicapping behaviors demonstrated a parallel mediation between academic PsyCap and CGPA such that academic PsyCap decreased self-handicapping behaviors, which in turn resulted in improved CGPA; on the other hand, academic PsyCap enhanced the flow experience, which led to improved academic achievement. Implications of the study and recommendations for future research are reflected upon.

Keywords: academic achievement; academic psychological capital (PsyCap); flow; self-handicapping behaviors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476
    1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (). New York, NY: Freeman.
    1. Beck, B. L., Koons, S. R., & Milgrim, D. L. (2000). Correlates and consequences of behavioral procrastination: The effects of academic procrastination, self-consciousness, self-esteem, and self-handicapping. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(5), 3-12.
    1. Chang, E. C., Bodem, M. R., Sanna, L. J., & Fabian, C. G. (2011). Optimism-pessimism and adjustment in college students: Is there support for the utility of a domain-specific approach to studying outcome expectancies? Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(5), 418-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2011.605167
    1. Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform (). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173582

LinkOut - more resources