Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan;115(1):3-10.
doi: 10.1111/vox.12866. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

Informed consent for whole blood donation

Affiliations
Review

Informed consent for whole blood donation

Brian Grainger et al. Vox Sang. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Background and objectives: It is recognized that blood transfusion services have an ethical duty to obtain informed consent from their voluntary, non-remunerated donors. This right was most recently affirmed by the 2017 revision of the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Code of Ethics. However, the constituent elements necessary to adequately inform such consent have not been definitively established.

Materials and methods: This review evaluates the historical background to informed consent in medicine and as it has been applied to blood donation. The question of what information should be disclosed is then considered with regard to existing statutory requirements in both the United States and EU as well guidance from relevant international organizations. The emerging ethical issues around repurposing of donated blood for sale as recovered plasma and use in research are included in this analysis.

Results: A reasonable basis is found in the literature to advocate that valid informed consent of blood donors should encompass: the donation process itself and potential adverse effects, the need for pre-donation transfusion-transmissible infection (TTI) screening, potential non-transfusion uses of derived products, requirements to obtain and store personal information, the consequences that non-disclosure of such information may have for both the donor and the recipient and reassurance as to the confidentiality of this information.

Conclusion: Informed consent is a key component of the duty of care between a blood service and its donor. We identify essential elements that should be present for such consent to be considered valid.

Keywords: blood collection; donor health; donors.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT): Code of Ethics Relating to Transfusion Medicine. ISBT General Assembly. Copenhagen. June 20, 2017.
    1. Dhinga N, Reed C, Kit LC, et al.: Blood donor counselling: implementation guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press, 2014
    1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF: Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1994
    1. Slater v. Baker & Stapleton. 1767. 95 Eng, 860, 2 Wils. KB 359
    1. Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital. 1914. 211 NY 125, 105 NE 92

LinkOut - more resources