Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan;30(1):65-72.
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000687.

Training in robot-assisted surgery

Affiliations
Review

Training in robot-assisted surgery

Stefano Puliatti et al. Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The aim of this narrative review is to identify the currently available training programs in the field of robotic-assisted surgery.

Recent findings: The lack of well trained robotic surgeons represents the main obstacle facing robotic surgery. This calls for development of structured robotic training programs in order to improve patient safety and outcomes. Structured curriculum should consist of theoretical training (e-learning, case observation), preclinical simulation-based training (virtual reality simulation, dry and wet lab), clinical modular training, and final evaluation. Tele-mentoring might reveal mandatory in future curricula development. To date, several training programs are currently available for robotic surgery. However, the majority lack of clinical modular training that consists of progressive, proficiency-based training through surgical steps with increasing levels of complexity. Moreover, many of these curricula lack validation.

Summary: This recent literature analysis suggests that there is an urgent need to develop and validate new structured training curricula for robotic surgery. This allows to improve the skills of the surgeons and of their team and to prevent patients from being used as a training module optimizing their safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Yates DR, Vaessen C, Roupret M. From Leonardo to da Vinci: the history of robot-assisted surgery in urology. BJU Int 2011; 108:1708–1713. discussion 1714.
    1. Hakenberg OW. A brief overview of the development of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Arab J Urol 2018; 16:293–296.
    1. Mottrie A, Larcher A, Patel V. The past, the present, and the future of robotic urology: robot-assisted surgery and human-assisted robots. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 4:629–631.
    1. Yuh BE, Hussain A, Chandrasekhar R, et al. Comparative analysis of global practice patterns in urologic robot-assisted surgery. J Endourol 2010; 24:1637–1644.
    1. Pierorazio PM, Allaf ME. Minimally invasive surgical training: challenges and solutions. Urol Oncol 2009; 27:208–213.

LinkOut - more resources