Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;27(4):297-304.
doi: 10.1111/acem.13888. Epub 2019 Dec 23.

Building RAFT: Trafficking Screening Tool Derivation and Validation Methods

Affiliations
Free article

Building RAFT: Trafficking Screening Tool Derivation and Validation Methods

Makini Chisolm-Straker et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Labor and sex trafficking have long impacted the patients who seek care in emergency departments (ED) across the United States. Increasing social and legislative pressures have led to multiple calls for screening for trafficking in the clinical care setting, but adoption of unvalidated screening tools for trafficking recognition is unwise for individual patient care and population-level data. Development of a valid screening tool for a social malady that is largely "invisible" to most clinicians requires significant investments. Valid screening tool development is largely a poorly understood process in the antitrafficking field and among clinicians who would use the tools.

Methods: The authors describe the study design and procedures for reliable data collection and analysis in the development of RAFT (Rapid Appraisal for Trafficking). In a five-ED, randomized, prospective study, RAFT will be derived and validated as a labor and sex trafficking screening tool for use among adult ED patients. Using a novel method of ED patient-participant randomization, intensively trained data collectors use qualitative data to assess subjects for a lifetime experience of human trafficking.

Conclusion: Study methodology transparency encourages investigative rigor and integrity and will allow other sites to reproduce and externally validate this study's findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-386), reauthorized by the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) of 2003 (P.L. 108-193), the TVPRA of 2005 (P.L. 109 164), and the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (WW-TVPA) of 2008 (P.L. 110-457) and the TVPRA of 2013 (P.L. 113-4).
    1. Farrell A, Reichert J. Using U.S. law-enforcement data: promise and limits in measuring human trafficking. J Hum Traffick 2017;3:39-60.
    1. Farrell A, Pfeffer R. How police find cases of human trafficking: cultural blinders and organizational barriers. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 2014;653:46-64.
    1. Farrell A, McDevitt J, Fahy S. Where are all the victims? Understanding the determinants of official identification of human trafficking incidents. Criminol Public Pol 2010;9:201-33.
    1. Baldwin SB, Eisenman DP, Sayles JN, Ryan G, Chuang KS. Identification of human trafficking victims in health care settings. Health Hum Rights 2011;13:E36-49.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources