Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Jan 1;138(1):31-37.
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.4517.

Validation of the Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening Criteria

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Validation of the Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening Criteria

Gil Binenbaum et al. JAMA Ophthalmol. .

Erratum in

  • Errors in Group Information.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 1;138(1):105. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.5915. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 31917432 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: The first Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity Study (G-ROP-1) developed new screening criteria with 100% sensitivity for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and 30% reduction of infants requiring examinations in a retrospective development cohort of 7483 infants from 29 North American hospitals in 2006-2012. Infants meeting 1 or more of the following criteria undergo examinations: gestational age less than 28 weeks or birth weight less than 1051 g; weight gain less than 120 g during age 10 to 19 days, weight gain less than 180 g during age 20 to 29 days, or weight gain less than 170 g during age 30 to 39 days; or hydrocephalus.

Objective: To evaluate the generalizability of the G-ROP screening criteria in a new cohort of at-risk infants.

Design, setting, and participants: This prospective validation cohort study (G-ROP-2) was conducted at 41 hospitals in the United States and Canada (25 G-ROP-1 hospitals and 16 new hospitals) from September 8, 2015, to June 13, 2017, among 3981 premature infants at risk for ROP and with known ROP outcomes.

Main outcomes and measures: Sensitivity for Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Study type 1 ROP and potential reduction in infants receiving examinations.

Results: Among the 3981 infants in the study (1878 girls and 2103 boys; median gestational age, 28 weeks [range, 22-35 weeks]; median birth weight, 1072 g [range, 350-4080 g]; 1966 white; 942 black; 321 Latino; 120 Asian; 22 Native Hawaian or Pacific Islander; and 25 American Indian or Alaskan Native), the G-ROP criteria correctly predicted 219 of 219 cases of type 1 ROP (sensitivity, 100%; 95% CI, 98.3%-100%), while reducing the number of infants undergoing examinations by 35.6% (n = 1418). In a combined G-ROP-1 and G-ROP-2 cohort of 11 463 infants, the G-ROP criteria predicted 677 of 677 cases of type 1 ROP (sensitivity, 100%; 95% CI, 99.4%-100%), reducing the number of infants receiving examinations by 32.5% (n = 3730), while current criteria (birth weight <1501 g or gestational age ≤30 weeks 0 days) predicted 674 of 677 type 1 cases (sensitivity, 99.6%; 95% CI, 98.7%-99.8%).

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that the G-ROP screening criteria were generalizable on validation and, if used clinically in the United States and Canada, could reduce the number of infants receiving examinations. The large G-ROP cohorts provide evidence-based screening criteria that have higher sensitivity and higher specificity (fewer infants receiving examinations) for type 1 ROP than currently recommended guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. Dr Repka reported being an American Academy of Ophthalmology consultant on government affairs. Dr Rogers reported receiving grants from the National Eye Institute outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity (G-ROP) Study Screening Criteria
The criteria would be applied by beginning at the lower left hand of the diagram and proceeding in a clockwise fashion around the 6 criteria. If the gestational age (GA) is younger than 28 weeks, then the infant would receive retinal examinations. If the GA is 28 weeks or older, the next criterion (birth weight [BW]) would be checked, and so forth. If none of the criteria apply, then the infant would not receive retinal examinations.

Comment in

References

    1. Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group Revised indications for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: results of the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(12):1684-1694. doi:10.1001/archopht.121.12.1684 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fierson WM; American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Ophthalmology; American Academy of Ophthalmology; American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus; American Association of Certified Orthoptists . Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics. 2013;131(1):189-195. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-2996 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quinn GE, Ying GS, Bell EF, et al. ; G-ROP Study Group . Incidence and early course of retinopathy of prematurity: secondary analysis of the Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity (G-ROP) Study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136(12):1383-1389. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.4290 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Binenbaum G, Tomlinson LA. Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity Study: rationale, design, and subject characteristics. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2017;24(1):36-47. doi:10.1080/09286586.2016.1255765 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hellström A, Hård AL, Engström E, et al. . Early weight gain predicts retinopathy in preterm infants: new, simple, efficient approach to screening. Pediatrics. 2009;123(4):e638-e645. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2697 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types