A Weighted Genomic Relationship Matrix Based on Fixation Index (FST) Prioritized SNPs for Genomic Selection
- PMID: 31726712
- PMCID: PMC6895924
- DOI: 10.3390/genes10110922
A Weighted Genomic Relationship Matrix Based on Fixation Index (FST) Prioritized SNPs for Genomic Selection
Abstract
A dramatic increase in the density of marker panels has been expected to increase the accuracy of genomic selection (GS), unfortunately, little to no improvement has been observed. By including all variants in the association model, the dimensionality of the problem should be dramatically increased, and it could undoubtedly reduce the statistical power. Using all Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to compute the genomic relationship matrix (G) does not necessarily increase accuracy as the additive relationships can be accurately estimated using a much smaller number of markers. Due to these limitations, variant prioritization has become a necessity to improve accuracy. The fixation index (FST) as a measure of population differentiation has been used to identify genome segments and variants under selection pressure. Using prioritized variants has increased the accuracy of GS. Additionally, FST can be used to weight the relative contribution of prioritized SNPs in computing G. In this study, relative weights based on FST scores were developed and incorporated into the calculation of G and their impact on the estimation of variance components and accuracy was assessed. The results showed that prioritizing SNPs based on their FST scores resulted in an increase in the genetic similarity between training and validation animals and improved the accuracy of GS by more than 5%.
Keywords: accuracy; genomic selection; high density; sequence data.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
FST-Based Marker Prioritization Within Quantitative Trait Loci Regions and Its Impact on Genomic Selection Accuracy: Insights from a Simulation Study with High-Density Marker Panels for Bovines.Genes (Basel). 2025 May 10;16(5):563. doi: 10.3390/genes16050563. Genes (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40428385 Free PMC article.
-
Increasing accuracy of genomic selection in presence of high density marker panels through the prioritization of relevant polymorphisms.BMC Genet. 2019 Feb 22;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12863-019-0720-5. BMC Genet. 2019. PMID: 30795734 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Feb 25;47(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12711-014-0084-2. Genet Sel Evol. 2015. PMID: 25888184 Free PMC article.
-
High density marker panels, SNPs prioritizing and accuracy of genomic selection.BMC Genet. 2018 Jan 5;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12863-017-0595-2. BMC Genet. 2018. PMID: 29304753 Free PMC article.
-
Genomic selection.J Anim Breed Genet. 2007 Dec;124(6):323-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00702.x. J Anim Breed Genet. 2007. PMID: 18076469 Review.
Cited by
-
Strategies to Increase Prediction Accuracy in Genomic Selection of Complex Traits in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.).Cells. 2021 Nov 30;10(12):3372. doi: 10.3390/cells10123372. Cells. 2021. PMID: 34943880 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shared Ancestry and Signatures of Recent Selection in Gotland Sheep.Genes (Basel). 2021 Mar 17;12(3):433. doi: 10.3390/genes12030433. Genes (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33802939 Free PMC article.
-
FST-Based Marker Prioritization Within Quantitative Trait Loci Regions and Its Impact on Genomic Selection Accuracy: Insights from a Simulation Study with High-Density Marker Panels for Bovines.Genes (Basel). 2025 May 10;16(5):563. doi: 10.3390/genes16050563. Genes (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40428385 Free PMC article.
-
Variable selection strategies for genomic prediction of growth and carcass related traits in experimental Nellore cattle herds under different selection criteria.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22266. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06949-z. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40594941 Free PMC article.
-
Role of multi-omics in aquaculture genetics and breeding: current status and future perspective.Sci China Life Sci. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s11427-024-2828-8. Online ahead of print. Sci China Life Sci. 2025. PMID: 40448907 Review.
References
-
- Schefers J.M., Weigel K.A. Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Integration of DNA testing into breeding programs. Anim. Front. 2012;2:4–9. doi: 10.2527/af.2011-0032. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous