Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 12;10(11):922.
doi: 10.3390/genes10110922.

A Weighted Genomic Relationship Matrix Based on Fixation Index (FST) Prioritized SNPs for Genomic Selection

Affiliations

A Weighted Genomic Relationship Matrix Based on Fixation Index (FST) Prioritized SNPs for Genomic Selection

Ling-Yun Chang et al. Genes (Basel). .

Abstract

A dramatic increase in the density of marker panels has been expected to increase the accuracy of genomic selection (GS), unfortunately, little to no improvement has been observed. By including all variants in the association model, the dimensionality of the problem should be dramatically increased, and it could undoubtedly reduce the statistical power. Using all Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to compute the genomic relationship matrix (G) does not necessarily increase accuracy as the additive relationships can be accurately estimated using a much smaller number of markers. Due to these limitations, variant prioritization has become a necessity to improve accuracy. The fixation index (FST) as a measure of population differentiation has been used to identify genome segments and variants under selection pressure. Using prioritized variants has increased the accuracy of GS. Additionally, FST can be used to weight the relative contribution of prioritized SNPs in computing G. In this study, relative weights based on FST scores were developed and incorporated into the calculation of G and their impact on the estimation of variance components and accuracy was assessed. The results showed that prioritizing SNPs based on their FST scores resulted in an increase in the genetic similarity between training and validation animals and improved the accuracy of GS by more than 5%.

Keywords: accuracy; genomic selection; high density; sequence data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Accuracy of genomic prediction for different weighting scenarios for the contribution of the 20K prioritized SNPs and the remaining 380K markers (x,y). Horizontal lines indicate the accuracy using only the top 20K SNPs with (red) or without (green) weights SNPs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Balloux F., Brunner H., Lugon-Moulin N., Hausser J., Goudet J. Microsatellites can be misleading: An empirical and simulation study. Evolution. 2000;54:1414–1422. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00573.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. VanRaden P., Van Tassell C., Wiggans G., Sonstegard T., Schnabel R., Taylor J., Schenkel F., Van Tassell C., Schnabel R. Invited Review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 2009;92:16–24. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1514. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Su G., Guldbrandtsen B., Gregersen V., Lund M. Preliminary investigation on reliability of genomic estimated breeding values in the Danish Holstein population. J. Dairy Sci. 2010;93:1175–1183. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2192. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Su G., Madsen P., Nielsen U.S., Mäntysaari E.A., Aamand G.P., Christensen O.F., Lund M.S. Genomic prediction for Nordic red cattle using one-step and selection index blending. J. Dairy Sci. 2012;95:909–917. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4804. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schefers J.M., Weigel K.A. Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Integration of DNA testing into breeding programs. Anim. Front. 2012;2:4–9. doi: 10.2527/af.2011-0032. - DOI

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources